Hi Maurik,<br><br>I had an email exchange yesterday with Tracy Slatyer who's done a lot of the work on CMB constraints (on dark matter annihilating to heavy photons). According to her, the big sensitivity gains from PLANCK come from the polarization data, which wasn't included in this year's release. She estimated only a 10-20% increase in expected sensitivity relative to WMAP...<br>
<br>(Tracy also tells me that ACT polarization + Planck temperature data could be very sensitive even without Planck's polarization data, and that Neelima Seghal is looking into this. I don't know the timescale for this result, but Rouven probably does...)<br>
<br>There is also a recent paper constraining heavy photons that decay to light fermions based on the number of relativistic d.o.f. <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.5379">arXiv:1303.5379</a>. But this constraint doesn't apply to dark photons that decay to ordinary matter (whether directly or through a dark-sector cascade).<br>
<br>Best regards,<br>Natalia<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 6:51 AM, Maurik Holtrop <<a href="mailto:maurik@physics.unh.edu">maurik@physics.unh.edu</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote">Dear HPS,<br>
<br>
The Planck collaboration has just released a large amount of new information. See:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://www.sciops.esa.int/index.php?project=PLANCK&page=Planck_Published_Papers">http://www.sciops.esa.int/index.php?project=PLANCK&page=Planck_Published_Papers</a><br>
And for the main summary paper: <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.5062">http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.5062</a><br>
<br>
I would be very interested in learning more about how these new results impact the search for heavy photons.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Maurik<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Hps mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Hps@jlab.org">Hps@jlab.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hps">https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hps</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>