[Hybrid baryons] DRAFT-2 of LOI

[Viktor Mokeev]

Dear Colleagues,

 Short comment: The Appendices A and B are repetitive. If you agree, I will combine them in a single Appendix. Please let me know your opinions?

  Best Regards,
                         Victor

----- Original Message -----
From: "burkert" <burkert at jlab.org>
To: "hybrid baryons" <hybrid_baryons at jlab.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 11:30:02 PM
Subject: [Hybrid baryons] DRAFT-2 of LOI

Dear all,

Thank you for supplying me with much valued new graphs and text. I tried 
to incorporate this information into the existing draft and have 
generated DRAFT-2, which is attached.  Obviously, I had to select a few 
graphs, but I included most of the text.  This new version is now nearly 
30 pages long, which is more than enough for a letter-of-intent.

DRAFT-2 has still duplications, and possibly inconsistencies in event 
rates, etc, which need to be checked.

Also there are duplications of references which could easily be avoided 
if everyone were to use the citation format from
Inspires, which I am using. These citations are unique. If you have sent 
me text with citations please replace them with
the Inspires citations (if existing). I am showing below one of our CLAS 
papers as it appears in latex as citation in Inspires (after deleting 
the commented out (%) lines).


%\cite{Pisano:2015iqa}
\bibitem{Pisano:2015iqa}
   S.~Pisano {\it et al.}  [CLAS Collaboration],
   Phys.\ Rev.\ D {\bf 91}, no. 5, 052014 (2015)
   [arXiv:1501.07052 [hep-ex]].


Please keep sending me corrections, comments, etc. before the Friday 
meeting, so we have a reasonable DRAFT-3 by the time of the meeting.

Best regards,
Volker



_______________________________________________
Hybrid_baryons mailing list
Hybrid_baryons at jlab.org
https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hybrid_baryons