[Hybrid baryons] Technical Advisory Report

[Viktor Mokeev]

Hi All,

Please find some considerations in regards of Joe evaluation:

``... no  discussion  is  given  regarding the other predicted hybrid baryons, the I= 1=2 state with JP= 5=2+ and
the two I= 3 =2 states"

  Joe always emphasized that LQCD information on high mass/spin hybrids still less reliable than for lowest states. This is the reason for consideration of the lowest mass hybrids. Another reason is: decays widths of higher mass hybrids become larger. They are getting strongly overlapped with many others regular/hybrid nucleon excitations. Therefore, extraction of information from the experimental data on higher mass hybrids becomes increasingly difficult.

``...Since the extraction of resonance
pole  information  from  amplitude  analysis  is  a  vital  step  in  the  program,
more detailed discussion and references should be presented, beyond simply
referring to \these advanced tools"

 This is a fair proposal. I would suggest to ask Adam to help us in addressing this comment.

  Should we respond for this comments?

   Best Regards,
                           Victor  

----- Original Message -----
From: "burkert" <burkert at jlab.org>
To: "hybrid baryons" <hybrid_baryons at jlab.org>
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 3:44:32 PM
Subject: [Hybrid baryons] Technical Advisory Report

Dear all,

Attached please find the JLab internal theory report on our letter of 
intent.
It is generally positive and makes some suggestions for the future 
proposal.

Volker



_______________________________________________
Hybrid_baryons mailing list
Hybrid_baryons at jlab.org
https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hybrid_baryons