[Hybrid baryons] Technical Advisory Report

[Viktor Mokeev]

  Hi Adam,

 I don't know on whether we should answer the comments for LOI. May be, we will take them into account in the full proposal preparation.

I suggest you to contact to Volker for definite answer.

  Best Regards,
                     Victor

----- Original Message -----
From: "aszczepa" <aszczepa at indiana.edu>
To: "hybrid baryons" <hybrid_baryons at jlab.org>
Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2015 2:27:47 PM
Subject: Re: [Hybrid baryons] Technical Advisory Report

Hi Victor 
What is the format/procedure for the response ? 
Adam 
---------------------------------- 
Adam Szczepaniak 
Department of Physics and CEEM 
Indiana University 
Jefferson Lab 
aszczepa at indiana.edu 




On Jun 12, 2015, at 4:22 PM, Viktor Mokeev < mokeev at jlab.org > wrote: 

Hi All, 

Please find some considerations in regards of Joe evaluation: 

``... no discussion is given regarding the other predicted hybrid baryons, the I= 1=2 state with JP= 5=2+ and 
the two I= 3 =2 states" 

Joe always emphasized that LQCD information on high mass/spin hybrids still less reliable than for lowest states. This is the reason for consideration of the lowest mass hybrids. Another reason is: decays widths of higher mass hybrids become larger. They are getting strongly overlapped with many others regular/hybrid nucleon excitations. Therefore, extraction of information from the experimental data on higher mass hybrids becomes increasingly difficult. 

``...Since the extraction of resonance 
pole information from amplitude analysis is a vital step in the program, 
more detailed discussion and references should be presented, beyond simply 
referring to \these advanced tools" 

This is a fair proposal. I would suggest to ask Adam to help us in addressing this comment. 

Should we respond for this comments? 

Best Regards, 
Victor 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "burkert" < burkert at jlab.org > 
To: "hybrid baryons" < hybrid_baryons at jlab.org > 
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 3:44:32 PM 
Subject: [Hybrid baryons] Technical Advisory Report 

Dear all, 

Attached please find the JLab internal theory report on our letter of 
intent. 
It is generally positive and makes some suggestions for the future 
proposal. 

Volker 



_______________________________________________ 
Hybrid_baryons mailing list 
Hybrid_baryons at jlab.org 
https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hybrid_baryons 
_______________________________________________ 
Hybrid_baryons mailing list 
Hybrid_baryons at jlab.org 
https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hybrid_baryons 


_______________________________________________
Hybrid_baryons mailing list
Hybrid_baryons at jlab.org
https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hybrid_baryons