[Hybrid baryons] an update for the KL channel (Evgeny)

[Annalisa D'Angelo]

Dear Eugeny,
I have the same remark for the KY channel, as for the pi+ pi- p one.

We are showing the azimuthal VS the polar angle particle acceptance for 
+/- 1500 A.
Would it be possible for you to produce the same plots for +/- 3375 A to 
be inserted in the proposal, instead?

The figures are:

thetaphie_6_p1500.pdf thetaphik_6_p1500.pdf

thetaphip_6_p1500.pdf

thetaphipim_6_p1500.pdf


thetaphie_6_m1500.pdf
thetaphik_6_m1500.pdf
thetaphip_6_m1500.pdf

thetaphipim_6_m1500.pdf


Thank you in advance
Annalisa
Il 19/04/16 21:10, golovach at jlab.org ha scritto:
> Annalisa, I am sending you an update of the figures.
> (I see, the text is beeing updated/modified, then could you, please,
>   update the figures in the updatet text.)
> My updates are basicaly figure updates.
>
> - The figures in the section ''run condition'' were re-plot
>    with the torus currents +/-1500 and +/-3375
> - The count rate was modified assuming 30 days of the beam time.
> - The minimal A12, A32, S12 were re-evaluated if using the
>    torus current -3375 and 30 days of the beam time
>    the figures 34--37 were re-plot accordingly.
> Annalisa, could you, please, look over the whole text to check
>    that the torus currents 2295 or 3700 do not appear anywhere.
>    We used the torus currents +/-1500 and +/-3375 to study the run conditions
>    and we used the torus current -3375 in all other studies.
>    Thank you.
>
>
> My few comments:
>
>
> 1)
> Ralf's comment: Affiliation typo:
> ``Scobeltsyn Institute of Physics, Moscow ...''
> The correct name is
> ``Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics,
>    Lomonosov Moscow State University''
>
>
> 2)
> Could we modify the figure presentation for the figures
> ``Comparison of the model cross section $d\sigma/d\cos(\theta_K)$...''
> and
> ``Comparison of the model cross section $d\sigma/d\Omega(\theta_K)$...'',
> so as the two figures stay on the same page and occupy the whole page.
> It would look nicer. The same applies to the following two figures.
>
>
> 3)
> Could we change the titles of the sections in the chapters 5 and 6
> to make them looking in the one-type style?
> I think, it would look nicer.
>
> 5.1
> Event generator for $ep \rightarrow ep \pi^+ \pi^-$
> 6.1
> Event generator for $ep \rightarrow e K\Lambda$ and $ep \rightarrow e
> K\Sigma^0$
>
> 5.2
> Acceptance for $ep \rightarrow ep \pi^+ \pi^-$
> 5.3
> Acceptance for $ep \rightarrow e K\Lambda$
>
> Could we combine sections 5.3 and 5.4 into the one section and call it
> 5.3
> Run conditions
> 6.3
> Run conditions
>
>
>
> Annalisa,
> I'm still working on the new figure 39, following Volker's suggestion.
> I'll send you an update ASAP.
>
>
> Best Regards,
>     Evgeny
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Hybrid_baryons mailing list
> Hybrid_baryons at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hybrid_baryons

-- 
================================================
Prof. Annalisa D'Angelo
Dip. Fisica, Universita' di Roma "Tor Vergata"
INFN Sezione di Roma Tor Vergata, Rome Italy
email:annalisa.dangelo at roma2.infn.it
Jefferson Laboratory, Newport News, VA USA
Email: annalisa at jlab.org
Tel: + 39 06 72594562
Fax: + 39 06 2040309

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/hybrid_baryons/attachments/20160421/7b95ba9a/attachment-0001.html>