<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">
Hi Victor
<div class="">What is the format/procedure for the response ? </div>
<div class="">Adam<br class="">
<div class="">
<div class="">
<div style="orphans: 2; widows: 2;" class="">----------------------------------</div>
<div style="orphans: 2; widows: 2;" class="">Adam Szczepaniak<br class="">
Department of Physics and CEEM </div>
<span style="orphans: 2; widows: 2;" class="">Indiana University</span>
<div style="orphans: 2; widows: 2;" class="">Jefferson Lab <br class="">
<a href="mailto:aszczepa@indiana.edu" class="">aszczepa@indiana.edu</a></div>
</div>
</div>
<br class="">
<div style="">
<blockquote type="cite" class="">
<div class="">On Jun 12, 2015, at 4:22 PM, Viktor Mokeev <<a href="mailto:mokeev@jlab.org" class="">mokeev@jlab.org</a>> wrote:</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<div class="">Hi All,<br class="">
<br class="">
Please find some considerations in regards of Joe evaluation:<br class="">
<br class="">
``... no discussion is given regarding the other predicted hybrid baryons, the I= 1=2 state with JP= 5=2+ and<br class="">
the two I= 3 =2 states"<br class="">
<br class="">
Joe always emphasized that LQCD information on high mass/spin hybrids still less reliable than for lowest states. This is the reason for consideration of the lowest mass hybrids. Another reason is: decays widths of higher mass hybrids become larger. They are
getting strongly overlapped with many others regular/hybrid nucleon excitations. Therefore, extraction of information from the experimental data on higher mass hybrids becomes increasingly difficult.<br class="">
<br class="">
``...Since the extraction of resonance<br class="">
pole information from amplitude analysis is a vital step in the program,<br class="">
more detailed discussion and references should be presented, beyond simply<br class="">
referring to \these advanced tools"<br class="">
<br class="">
This is a fair proposal. I would suggest to ask Adam to help us in addressing this comment.<br class="">
<br class="">
Should we respond for this comments?<br class="">
<br class="">
Best Regards,<br class="">
Victor <br class="">
<br class="">
----- Original Message -----<br class="">
From: "burkert" <<a href="mailto:burkert@jlab.org" class="">burkert@jlab.org</a>><br class="">
To: "hybrid baryons" <<a href="mailto:hybrid_baryons@jlab.org" class="">hybrid_baryons@jlab.org</a>><br class="">
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 3:44:32 PM<br class="">
Subject: [Hybrid baryons] Technical Advisory Report<br class="">
<br class="">
Dear all,<br class="">
<br class="">
Attached please find the JLab internal theory report on our letter of <br class="">
intent.<br class="">
It is generally positive and makes some suggestions for the future <br class="">
proposal.<br class="">
<br class="">
Volker<br class="">
<br class="">
<br class="">
<br class="">
_______________________________________________<br class="">
Hybrid_baryons mailing list<br class="">
<a href="mailto:Hybrid_baryons@jlab.org" class="">Hybrid_baryons@jlab.org</a><br class="">
https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hybrid_baryons<br class="">
_______________________________________________<br class="">
Hybrid_baryons mailing list<br class="">
Hybrid_baryons@jlab.org<br class="">
https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hybrid_baryons<br class="">
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br class="">
</div>
</body>
</html>