<div dir="ltr">Dear all<div><br></div><div>I compared train output under</div><div>/volatile/clas12/rg-k/production/recon/fall2018/torus+1/6535MeV/pass1/v7/<br></div><div>which I believe is the "old" pass 1 with</div><div>/volatile/clas12//rg-k/production/recon/fall2018/torus+1/6535MeV/pass1/v19/denoise_1002/train/<br></div><div>which should be the "denoise pass 2" (?)</div><div><br></div><div>Here are the numbers I obtained</div><div><br></div><div>DVCS pass 1 FD = 6564 , CD =
18318</div><div>DVCS denoise FD = 8135 , CD = 31159<br>DVCS gains FD = 23.9% , CD = 70.1%<br><br>pi0 pass 1 FD = 4952 , CD =
12395</div><div>pi0 denoise FD = 6606 , CD = 21126<br>pi0 gain FD = 33.4% , CD = 70.4%<br></div><div><br></div><div><div>phi pass 1 FD = 51.5</div><div>phi denoise FD = 93.0<br>phi gain FD = 80.6%<br></div><div><br></div></div><div>Please let me know if there are additional comparisons or investigation I can perform to wrap this up</div><div><br></div><div>Best regards</div><div>FX</div><div><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 10:10 AM Annalisa D'Angelo <<a href="mailto:annalisa.dangelo@roma2.infn.it">annalisa.dangelo@roma2.infn.it</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div>
<p>Dear Lucilla,</p>
<p>can you please point at the pass1 trains, please.<br>
</p>
<div><br>
Thank you in advance</div>
<div>Annalisa</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>-------- Messaggio Inoltrato
--------
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th valign="BASELINE" nowrap align="RIGHT">Oggetto:
</th>
<td>Re: [Hybrid baryons] [EXTERNAL] new rgk trains (clara
5.0.2 coatjava 10.0.2)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="BASELINE" nowrap align="RIGHT">Data: </th>
<td>Tue, 1 Aug 2023 09:42:08 -0400</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="BASELINE" nowrap align="RIGHT">Mittente:
</th>
<td>Francois-Xavier Girod via Hybrid_baryons
<a href="mailto:hybrid_baryons@jlab.org" target="_blank"><hybrid_baryons@jlab.org></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="BASELINE" nowrap align="RIGHT">Rispondi-a:
</th>
<td>Francois-Xavier Girod <a href="mailto:fxgirod@jlab.org" target="_blank"><fxgirod@jlab.org></a>,
<a href="mailto:hybrid_baryons@jlab.org" target="_blank">hybrid_baryons@jlab.org</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="BASELINE" nowrap align="RIGHT">A: </th>
<td>Annalisa D'Angelo <a href="mailto:annalisa@jlab.org" target="_blank"><annalisa@jlab.org></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th valign="BASELINE" nowrap align="RIGHT">CC: </th>
<td><a href="mailto:hybrid_baryons@jlab.org" target="_blank">hybrid_baryons@jlab.org</a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<br>
<br>
Dear Annalisa, all<br>
<br>
Could someone point me out to the directories I should compare
then?<br>
It will not take long to run my code again but I would rather not<br>
guess the files locations<br>
<br>
Thank you<br>
<br>
Best regards<br>
FX<br>
<br>
On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 5:39 AM Annalisa D'Angelo
<a href="mailto:annalisa@jlab.org" target="_blank"><annalisa@jlab.org></a> wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre>Dear FX,
thank you very much!
It would be great if you could could compare results among pass1 and
pass2 with denoising. Please tell us if you need and any additional
input from us.
Annalisa
Il 31/07/23 17:22, Francois-Xavier Girod via Hybrid_baryons ha scritto:
<blockquote type="cite"><pre>Dear all
I also analyzed the exclusive phi events since they have 4 charged
particles in the forward detectors
exclu phi integrated peak estimated events:
no denoise : 75.7
denoise : 93.0
gain : 22.8%
(raw spectra without fitting the peak gives: no denoise 1058, denoise
1181, gain 11.6%)
Best regards
FX
On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 9:55 AM Francois-Xavier Girod <a href="mailto:fxgirod@jlab.org" target="_blank"><fxgirod@jlab.org></a> wrote:
<blockquote type="cite"><pre>Dear all
Here are some deep exclusive reactions comparison results between "6.5
GeV no denoise" and "6.5 GeV denoise"
DVCS no denoise FD = 7845 , CD = 30260
DVCS denoise FD = 8135 , CD = 31159
DVCS gains FD = 3.7% , CD = 3.0%
pi0 no denoise FD = 6396 , CD = 20721
pi0 denoise FD = 6606 , CD = 21126
pi0 gain FD = 3.3% , CD = 1.9%
skim20 "pip pim pi0" which should contain exclusive omega events is
not working for some reason I think
Best regards
FX
On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 5:12 PM Lucilla Lanza via Hybrid_baryons
<a href="mailto:hybrid_baryons@jlab.org" target="_blank"><hybrid_baryons@jlab.org></a> wrote:
<blockquote type="cite"><pre>Dear all,
You can find the new rgk trains (clara 5.0.2 coatjava 10.0.2) at:
6.5 GeV denoise (5901,5906,5913,5920,5986,5990):
/volatile/clas12//rg-k/production/recon/fall2018/torus+1/6535MeV/pass1/v19/denoise_1002/train/
6.5 GeV no denoise (5901,5906,5913,5920,5986,5990):
/volatile/clas12//rg-k/production/recon/fall2018/torus+1/6535MeV/pass1/v19/no_denoise_1002///train/
7.5 GeV no denoise (5682,5696,5700,5708,5734,5791):
/volatile/clas12//rg-k/production/recon/fall2018/torus+1/7546MeV/pass1/v19/no_denoise_1002///train/
Please let me know if you have any comment or question.
Best regards,
Lucilla
<blockquote type="cite"><pre><blockquote type="cite"><pre>Il 2023-07-25 22:06 Raffaella De Vita ha scritto:
<blockquote type="cite"><pre>Dear Lucilla,
Daniel noticed the REC::Scintillator banks in the skims seem to be
corrupted. I did some investigation and found that the version of the
train that was run is based on an old coatjava version where the
REC::Scintillator bank was different than what it is now. This is
likely the cause of the problem.
We verified the skims can be recovered (with no need to rerun the
trains), replacing the bank schema in the files. This can be done
running the following command for each of the skim files;
hipo-utils -update -d
/group/clas12/packages/clara/5.0.2_10.0.2/plugins/clas12/etc/bankdefs/hipo4
-o recovered-skim.hipo original-skim.hipo
which basically restores the correct schema.
My suggestion is to create a new directory where to write the
recovered files with the same directory structure as the train
output.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Best regards,
Raffaella
<blockquote type="cite"><pre>On 24 Jul 2023, at 09:28, Lucilla Lanza
<a href="mailto:lucilla.lanza@roma2.infn.it" target="_blank"><lucilla.lanza@roma2.infn.it></a> wrote:
Dear all,
the rgk dst files with (5901,5906,5913,5920,5986,5990) and without
(5682,5696,5700,5708,5734,5791,5901,5906,5913,5920,5986,5990)
denoising applied are available for comparison (coatjava 10.0.2,
timestamp 07/15/2023-03:00:00).
No denoising:
/volatile/clas12/rg-k/production/recon/fall2018/torus+1/6535MeV/pass0/v0_cook_no_denoise_new/dst/recon/
Denoising:
/volatile/clas12/rg-k/production/recon/fall2018/torus+1/6535MeV/pass0/v0_cook_denoise_new/dst/recon/
You can find the corresponding skims with and without denoising
applied at:
6.5 GeV denoise (5901,5906,5913,5920,5986,5990):
/volatile/clas12//rg-k/production/recon/fall2018/torus+1/6535MeV/pass1/v19/denoise/train/
7.5 GeV no denoise (5682,5696,5700,5708,5734,5791):
/volatile/clas12//rg-k/production/recon/fall2018/torus+1/7546MeV/pass1/v19/no_denoise/train/
6.5 GeV no denoise (5901,5906,5913,5920,5986,5990):
/volatile/clas12//rg-k/production/recon/fall2018/torus+1/6535MeV/pass1/v19/no_denoise/train/
Please let me know if you have any comment or question.
Best regards,
Lucilla
</pre></blockquote></pre></blockquote></pre></blockquote></pre></blockquote>_______________________________________________
Hybrid_baryons mailing list
<a href="mailto:Hybrid_baryons@jlab.org" target="_blank">Hybrid_baryons@jlab.org</a>
<a href="https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hybrid_baryons" target="_blank">https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hybrid_baryons</a>
</pre></blockquote></pre></blockquote>_______________________________________________
Hybrid_baryons mailing list
<a href="mailto:Hybrid_baryons@jlab.org" target="_blank">Hybrid_baryons@jlab.org</a>
<a href="https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hybrid_baryons" target="_blank">https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hybrid_baryons</a>
</pre></blockquote>
--
================================================
Prof. Annalisa D'Angelo
Dip. Fisica, Universita' di Roma "Tor Vergata"
Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare
Sezione di Roma Tor Vergata, Rome Italy
<a href="mailto:email:annalisa.dangelo@roma2.infn.it" target="_blank">email:annalisa.dangelo@roma2.infn.it</a>
Jefferson Laboratory, Newport News, VA USA
Email: <a href="mailto:annalisa@jlab.org" target="_blank">annalisa@jlab.org</a>
Tel: + 39 06 72594562
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Hybrid_baryons mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Hybrid_baryons@jlab.org" target="_blank">Hybrid_baryons@jlab.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hybrid_baryons" target="_blank">https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/hybrid_baryons</a><br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote></div>