[Isotope-prod] Draft for edit

[Hutton Andrew]

And now with the edited version!

Andrew

> On Dec 9, 2015, at 5:01 PM, Hutton Andrew <andrew at jlab.org> wrote:
> 
> George
> 
> I edited the whole thing - my way of reading it attentively.  
> 
> Overall, I find it very convincing.  The only thing I did not see addressed is the ratio of Copper 67 to the overall copper content (the specific activity).  This is one of the main problems with the other methods for producing Copper67; the patients would die of copper poisoning because the specific activity is too low.  
> 
> Can someone look at that?
> 
> Thanks for getting it this far!  
> 
> Andrew
> 
>> On Dec 7, 2015, at 6:21 AM, George Neil <neil at jlab.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Attached is an assemblage of your inputs.   I did little to anyone's offering besides unify the formatting.  Please use "Track Changes" so I can see what you've done.  I would like inputs by COB Wednesday.
>> George
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Isotope-prod mailing list
>> Isotope-prod at jlab.org
>> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/isotope-prod
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Isotope-prod mailing list
> Isotope-prod at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/isotope-prod
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Isotope Final Report Draft rev5ah.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 2694746 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/isotope-prod/attachments/20151209/7ef00b08/attachment-0001.docx>