[Isotope-prod] Draft for edit

[George Neil]

thanks Doug.  Good points.
George


On 12/9/2015 8:18 PM, Wells, Douglas P. wrote:
> Having gone through the VCU-commented/edited version, and Andrew's version, I do not have additional comments beyond the question of actual production rates.  The sparcity of real data and the large uncertainties in the models leads me to think that the numbers expressed for 71Ga(gamma, alpha)67Cu could be an order of magnitude too high.   Of course, the reviewers will not have better estimates, either, but once this report is finalized I think that we should have a conversation about these calculations.
>
> Also of interest, in follow-up to Andrew's important comment about SA, is that there is little (or none) real data about how cleanly one can separate Ga from Cu, which is why we have a large uncertainty in the final SA.   How one finesses these two issues in the final document is an important question, but I would argue that one can typically exploit such uncertainties via variations on the timeless phrase: "Further research is urgently needed."
>
> Thanks---D
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Isotope-prod [mailto:isotope-prod-bounces at jlab.org] On Behalf Of Sundaresan Gobalakrishnan
> Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 3:28 PM
> To: Hutton Andrew; George Neil
> Cc: Kharashvili George
> Subject: Re: [Isotope-prod] Draft for edit
>
>   Dear George and All,
>
> Attached is our edited version. We swapped the old content with new content that is relevant to VCU (Section 4 and Appendix B).
>
> Please let me know if you have questions.
>
> Best regards,
> Sundaresan
>
> _____________________________________________
> Sundaresan Gobalakrishnan, PhD
> Assistant Professor
> Center for Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA - 23298
> Phone: 804-628-9165; Fax: 804-628-0223
> E-mail: sundaresan.gobalakrishnan at vcuhealth.org
>
>