[Lerftest-ctrls] Disregard Issue with LLRF-CPU networking

Slepicka, Hugo Henrique slepicka at slac.stanford.edu
Thu Sep 13 12:02:24 EDT 2018


Hi Sonya,

Great news! Thank you for looking into that.

Hugo

> On Sep 13, 2018, at 8:59 AM, Sonya Hoobler <sonya at slac.stanford.edu> wrote:
> 
> Hi Hugo, all,
> 
> I think there is no problem here after all.
> 
> There was a typo in the ifconfig commands that get executed on startup. And it turns out there was a power-cycle of the CPU between tests yesterday; consequently eth0 was not set.
> 
> So I think we're good.
> 
> Thanks everyone for youe help!
> 
> Sonya
> 
> 
>> On Wed, 12 Sep 2018, Sonya Hoobler wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Hugo,
>> 
>> Thanks for your reply.
>> 
>>> - Is this also happening to the other CPU?
>> 
>> I can't say for sure because we have not used that CPU as much. I will keep an eye out for it.
>> 
>>> - Can you send the output of ifconfig -a before the issue and after it happens?
>> 
>> Yes, pasted below.
>> 
>>> - Was any board added to the cpu?
>> 
>> No.
>> 
>> Here's the console output:
>> 
>> # ifconfig
>> eth1      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 74:FE:48:28:BC:6F
>>         inet addr:192.168.1.31  Bcast:192.168.1.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
>>         inet6 addr: fe80::76fe:48ff:fe28:bc6f/64 Scope:Link
>>         UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>>         RX packets:458 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>>         TX packets:330 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>>         collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
>>         RX bytes:37974 (37.0 KiB)  TX bytes:30524 (29.8 KiB)
>>         Memory:fbc40000-fbc5ffff
>> 
>> eth4      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 74:FE:48:28:BC:73
>>         inet addr:129.57.244.50  Bcast:129.57.244.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
>>         inet6 addr: fe80::76fe:48ff:fe28:bc73/64 Scope:Link
>>         UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>>         RX packets:204696 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>>         TX packets:87614 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>>         collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
>>         RX bytes:151125119 (144.1 MiB)  TX bytes:58701018 (55.9 MiB)
>>         Memory:fbb00000-fbb7ffff
>> 
>> lo        Link encap:Local Loopback
>>         inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
>>         inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
>>         UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:65536  Metric:1
>>         RX packets:2565 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>>         TX packets:2565 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>>         collisions:0 txqueuelen:1
>>         RX bytes:112828 (110.1 KiB)  TX bytes:112828 (110.1 KiB)
>> 
>> # ifconfig eth0 192.168.0.31
>> [ 4317.679571] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready
>> # [ 4321.134743] igb 0000:06:00.0 eth0: igb: eth0 NIC Link is Up 1000 Mbps Full Duplex, Flow Control: RX/TX
>> [ 4321.145309] IPv6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): eth0: link becomes ready
>> 
>> # ifconfig
>> eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 74:FE:48:28:BC:6E
>>         inet addr:192.168.0.31  Bcast:192.168.0.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
>>         inet6 addr: fe80::76fe:48ff:fe28:bc6e/64 Scope:Link
>>         UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>>         RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>>         TX packets:1039 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>>         collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
>>         RX bytes:0 (0.0 B)  TX bytes:43950 (42.9 KiB)
>>         Memory:fbc60000-fbc7ffff
>> 
>> eth1      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 74:FE:48:28:BC:6F
>>         inet addr:192.168.1.31  Bcast:192.168.1.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
>>         inet6 addr: fe80::76fe:48ff:fe28:bc6f/64 Scope:Link
>>         UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>>         RX packets:498 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>>         TX packets:355 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>>         collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
>>         RX bytes:41010 (40.0 KiB)  TX bytes:32294 (31.5 KiB)
>>         Memory:fbc40000-fbc5ffff
>> 
>> eth4      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 74:FE:48:28:BC:73
>>         inet addr:129.57.244.50  Bcast:129.57.244.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
>>         inet6 addr: fe80::76fe:48ff:fe28:bc73/64 Scope:Link
>>         UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>>         RX packets:221120 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>>         TX packets:93130 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>>         collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
>>         RX bytes:163125857 (155.5 MiB)  TX bytes:62840378 (59.9 MiB)
>>         Memory:fbb00000-fbb7ffff
>> 
>> lo        Link encap:Local Loopback
>>         inet addr:127.0.0.1  Mask:255.0.0.0
>>         inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host
>>         UP LOOPBACK RUNNING  MTU:65536  Metric:1
>>         RX packets:3471 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>>         TX packets:3471 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>>         collisions:0 txqueuelen:1
>>         RX bytes:188468 (184.0 KiB)  TX bytes:188468 (184.0 KiB)
>> 
>> Thanks again,
>> Sonya
>> 
>>> On Wed, 12 Sep 2018, Slepicka, Hugo Henrique wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> I personally never saw this behavior.
>>> Looping Ernest and Thuy too so they can also contribute on this case.
>>> *Larry and Sonya*:
>>> - Is this also happening to the other CPU?
>>> - Can you send the output of ifconfig -a before the issue and after it happens?
>>> - Was any board added to the cpu?
>>> Thank you,
>>> Hugo
>>> On 9/12/18, 1:23 PM, "Lerftest-ctrls on behalf of Sonya Hoobler" <lerftest-ctrls-bounces at jlab.org on behalf of sonya at slac.stanford.edu> wrote:
>>> 
>>>   Hi again,
>>> 
>>>   Larry called and repoted that the interface seemed to be down again and,
>>>   indeed, eth0 no longer appeared in ifconfig.
>>> 
>>>   *Larry*, do you know if anything was power-cycled or disconnected before
>>>   you found the problem? That info would help for our troubleshooting.
>>> 
>>>   *Hugo*, have you encountered this before? This is not the first time I've
>>>   found eth0 missing for these systems, but since I'm remote and not fully
>>>   aware of what is happening locally, I have not yet tried to troubleshoot
>>>   it.
>>> 
>>>   Thanks everyone,
>>>      Sonya
>>> 
>>>   On Wed, 12 Sep 2018, Sonya Hoobler wrote:
>>> 
>>>   > Hi Wesley,
>>>   >
>>>   > The ifconfig eth0 was not set (which is odd but I believe I have seen this
>>>   > before). I have set it and it should be working now.
>>>   >
>>>   > Sonya
>>>   >
>>>   >
>>>   > On Wed, 12 Sep 2018, Wesley Moore wrote:
>>>   >
>>>   >> Sonya,
>>>   >>
>>>   >>
>>>   >> Larry is seeing a comm issue from lcls-llrfcpu01 to the rack's switch.
>>>   >> Port 1 on the cpu appears inactive/dead (pic 1).  This results in the
>>>   >> uplink in the rack being down (pic 2).  Larry moved from Port 1 to another
>>>   >> port up and saw the uplink briefly.  So it's believed that everything
>>>   >> downstream of cpu01 is fine.  Please advise.
>>>   >>
>>>   >>
>>>   >> # pic 1: lcls-llrfcpu01, port 1 inactive.
>>>   >>
>>>   >> [cid:1ffd57f5-4469-41d5-885a-0ba16ff448a9]
>>>   >>
>>>   >>
>>>   >> # pic 2: LLRF rack switch, all lights on left are solid, uplink on
>>>   >> far-right is inactive.
>>>   >>
>>>   >> [cid:7cd84393-99e7-4dab-a88d-8bedc95f7115]
>>>   >>
>>>   >>
>>>   >> Wesley
>>>   >>
>>>   >
>>>   _______________________________________________
>>>   Mailing List: Lerftest-ctrls at jlab.org
>>>   https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/lerftest-ctrls
>>>   Wiki: https://wiki.jlab.org/lerf/index.php/Network



More information about the Lerftest-ctrls mailing list