[Moller_simulation] [Moller_intdet] Integrating Detectors Phone Meeting schedule

Michel Gericke mgericke at jlab.org
Thu May 30 00:02:14 EDT 2019

Hi Rakitha,

I am not sure what you mean. I was not suggesting that the simulation 
meetings should be changed. Only the going from two
detector meetings a month to one detector meeting a month (keeping the 
two simulation meetings).


On 2019-05-29 10:58 p.m., Rakitha Sanjeewa Beminiwattha wrote:
> Hi All,
> I'd suggest we meet every other week to discuss simulation updates and 
> if there are any main detector related items we can discuss as part of 
> these simulations meeting agenda. Just send me an email and I can add 
> that to simulation meeting agenda. Then once a month main detector 
> folks can take over the simulation meeting to discuss their progress 
> with main detectors.
> Rakitha Beminiwattha
> Assistant Professor of Physics
> Office: Engineering Annex 210
> Louisiana Tech University
> Tel No. 318 257 2435
> https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1473-1651 
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__orcid.org_0000-2D0002-2D1473-2D1651&d=DwMFaQ&c=CJqEzB1piLOyyvZjb8YUQw&r=n8yp2esm0KFRKpaGXzCWkswkaFnv92cJmpaE2yrYpV8&m=u-hLDmhn8022tS4s55o5CT76cSaEi90TQ-QwcoiqCwY&s=C_eEzwyp-Zc5fADB3NRM9lrxG8vBEZCsfg4md140OeA&e=>
> On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 10:52 PM Michel Gericke <mgericke at jlab.org 
> <mailto:mgericke at jlab.org>> wrote:
>     Dear Colleagues,
>     During the previous phone meeting, I brought up the possibility to
>     have the
>     detector meeting only once a month. A lot of progress is being made on
>     several fronts, including electronics, PMT bases, SLAC test data
>     analysis, etc.,
>     but many of these tasks are longer term and currently steeped in
>     detail,
>     that
>     may not have to be discussed every two weeks. In fact, since the
>     start
>     of the
>     year, the phone meetings have been fairly thin on content. Another
>     contributing
>     factor is that the simulation side of detector development is mostly
>     discussed
>     in the simulation meeting and that repetition in the detector
>     meeting seems
>     unnecessary.
>     On the other hand it has also been brought up that keeping the
>     current
>     meeting
>     schedule, but allowing for very short meetings with short updates
>     may be
>     a better
>     way to keep everyone up-to-date.
>     Please let me know what you prefer.
>     Cheers,
>     Michael
>     _______________________________________________
>     Moller_intdet mailing list
>     Moller_intdet at jlab.org <mailto:Moller_intdet at jlab.org>
>     https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/moller_intdet

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/moller_simulation/attachments/20190529/437c3528/attachment.html>

More information about the Moller_simulation mailing list