[Nuclear-data-miners] New data mining proposal

[Mark Strikman]

Dear Larry,

It is certainly a good idea to go forward with proposal. Ultimate rate of funding you suggest  is minimal which may allow the study to be done.However I think it is reasonable to ask for you  - this would impove the chances to get the minimum you describe.



Also,  I think it would be helpful for writing the suggestions for the topics to be studied to be included in the proposal 
 if you send a list of topics which will be in the part done /close to completion part.

Best regards,

Mark


On Mar 31, 2014, at 5:53 PM, Larry Weinstein wrote:

> 
> 
> Dear Data Miners,
> 
> I want to submit a new proposal to DOE in order to get continued support
> for the Data Mining project and build on the great success we have so
> far.  New proposals are due to DOE by May 1.
> 
> I am thinking of asking for a postdoc, a student, and some travel
> funds.  The postdoc would be to support the data mining analyses around
> the world.
> 
> If you think this is a good idea, then please let me know what physics
> we should include, which analyses to mention, and what else we should
> request from DOE.  If you think that this is a bad idea, please let me
> know why.
> 
> -- 
> 				Sincerely,
> 				Larry
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> Lawrence Weinstein
> University Professor
> Physics Department
> Old Dominion University
> Norfolk, VA 23529
> 757 683 5803
> 757 683 3038 (fax)
> weinstein at odu.edu
> http://www.lions.odu.edu/~lweinste/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nuclear-data-miners mailing list
> nuclear-data-miners at jlab.org
> https://mailman.jlab.org/mailman/listinfo/nuclear-data-miners