[Pansophy] Update on BLAs in CMM room and NCRs need clearing

[Mike Dickey]

All,

After following the discussion about the BLAs, I looked at the travelers (L2PRD-CM-INSP-BLA) and noticed that none of them are closed.  Please remember that when an inspection is complete, that traveler should be closed to finalize any NCR disposition.  If the disposition is "USE AS IS", the part is not qualified if the inspection traveler is still open.

Thank,

Mike Dickey
SRF Inventory Technician
Jefferson Lab
12000 Jefferson Ave
Newport News, VA 23606
(757) 269-7755

From: HyeKyoung Park <hkpark at jlab.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 6, 2019 5:20 PM
To: Liang Zhao <lzhao at jlab.org>
Cc: George DeKerlegand <georged at jlab.org>; Scott Williams <scott at jlab.org>; Mike Dickey <mdickey at jlab.org>; Kirk Davis <kdavis at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: Update on BLAs in CMM room and NCRs need clearing

Hi Liang,
Please write an NCR for 207. This is a possible blistering after baking. Would you please take good pictures? I also like to get some feedback from SLAC. For all others, please follow the NCR responses.
Thanks!
HyeKyoung
________________________________
From: Liang Zhao <lzhao at jlab.org<mailto:lzhao at jlab.org>>
Sent: Wednesday, November 6, 2019 4:03 PM
To: HyeKyoung Park <hkpark at jlab.org<mailto:hkpark at jlab.org>>
Cc: George DeKerlegand <georged at jlab.org<mailto:georged at jlab.org>>; Scott Williams <scott at jlab.org<mailto:scott at jlab.org>>; Mike Dickey <mdickey at jlab.org<mailto:mdickey at jlab.org>>; Kirk Davis <kdavis at jlab.org<mailto:kdavis at jlab.org>>
Subject: Update on BLAs in CMM room and NCRs need clearing

Hi HyeKyoung,

I have rejected two BLAs (204 (reject) and 233 (return to vendor)) according to your response to the NCR. I will take them to Mike's area. The question is: Do I take the matching absorber with the housing to Mike as well? Do they need to be assembled together before taken to Mike?

The rest four BLAs still need update with their NCR to move forward.
Here is what I'm going to do with them, please correct me as needed:

209, NCR on bare spots on copper plating, will take more picture of the bare spots for future reference, then move forward to cleaning and baking. Will need NCR to be cleard before moving forward.

207, no NCR from initial inspection, came back from chemistry and baking due to bolt hole issue, now has bare spots on copper plating. Should it move forward with similar path as 209? I will make a note instead of creating an NCR for the bare spots.

218, NCR on questionable plating (bare spot or just discoloration). Will move forward to cleaning and baking. Will need NCR to be cleared before moving forward.

241, NCR on flange scratches. Flanges have been polished and NCR updated. Can move forward to cleaning and baking now. Need NCR to be cleared.

For tomorrow, I will take a look at the plating of the three bellows from Scott. These three had been accidentally baked at 1000C. We will find out if there is any obvious defects preventing them from being usable.

Then I will work on the ones coming from leak check as they appear. I have two of these in the CMM room for now.

Thanks,
Liang
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20191107/4094922f/attachment-0001.html>