[Pansophy] Possible Future NCR Categories

[Valerie Bookwalter]

Liang,

I agree... I separated surface damage only to see if it is necessary to have all the sub-categories.
And yes categories should be moved.
And yes group names can be changed to whatever "they" want.
And yes different groups may have the same sub-categories.

It is all about what "they" want

Valerie


From: Liang Zhao <lzhao at jlab.org>
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2020 1:10 PM
To: Valerie Bookwalter <bookwalt at jlab.org>; E. Anne McEwen <mcewen at jlab.org>
Cc: pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: Possible Future NCR Categories

Hi Valerie,

>From a quick look at the inspection parts, in my opinion, surface damage is part of visual inspection. And what is in the Visual Inspection box now is more like mechanical/physical damage of components, as opposed to surface damage. Parallelism is more of a dimensional issue rather than a surface damage.

Generally speaking, i think it is a good start. I imagine there will be some feedback on which items belongs to which box and the title of the boxes.
Such as, the "Cryomodule" box is mainly about cryomodule assembly. Looking forward to the discussions.

Thanks,
Liang

________________________________
From: Valerie Bookwalter <bookwalt at jlab.org<mailto:bookwalt at jlab.org>>
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2020 11:18 PM
To: E. Anne McEwen <mcewen at jlab.org<mailto:mcewen at jlab.org>>
Cc: Liang Zhao <lzhao at jlab.org<mailto:lzhao at jlab.org>>; pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>>
Subject: Possible Future NCR Categories


Anne,



Here is a first cut at possible NCR categories.



Valerie


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20200625/b1c0c1aa/attachment.html>