[Pansophy] Traveler revision

[John Fischer]

All,
Thank You for the reminder. I am trying to understand how creating 3 times as many Travelers vs. asking another work center to fill out their part fits. Effort seems unbalanced to me. Just my two cents, and guessing it's why I didn't act on it. Is there a bigger picture I'm missing?
JF

From: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 5, 2020 12:13 PM
To: John Fischer <fischer at jlab.org>; Kurt Macha <macha at jlab.org>; Tony Reilly <areilly at jlab.org>; George DeKerlegand <georged at jlab.org>; Gary Cheng <cheng at jlab.org>
Cc: pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: FW: Traveler revision

Hello all,

This is the email mentioned in the P1 meeting. Since it's been a few weeks, the travelers that need to be split up in this manner are P1-CMA-SWP-INSP, P1-CMA-THTD-INSP, and P1-THTS-INSP. Drop them in the new ready for approval folder when they are done and I'll route for approval.

Allen

From: Allen Samuels
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2020 2:02 PM
To: John Fischer <fischer at jlab.org<mailto:fischer at jlab.org>>; Kurt Macha <macha at jlab.org<mailto:macha at jlab.org>>; Tony Reilly <areilly at jlab.org<mailto:areilly at jlab.org>>; George DeKerlegand <georged at jlab.org<mailto:georged at jlab.org>>; Gary Cheng <cheng at jlab.org<mailto:cheng at jlab.org>>
Cc: pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>>
Subject: Traveler revision

Hey all. I hate to be the one to bear bad news, but the P1 travelers that got approved yesterday will need to be revised. They need to be separated into three travelers each; a regular inspection, a leak check inspection, and a weld inspection. The IDs should look something like as follows: P1-CWI-COMP, P1-INSP-COMP, and P1-CMA-COMP-LEAK. Please let me know if you need any additional help in this.

Allen

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20201105/25c5191a/attachment.html>