[Pansophy] SNSPPU Traveler Discussion / Frustration / Changes / Demands - Please help!

[E. Anne McEwen]

Hi Valerie

Tony is out today on vacation , however I will see if a meeting can be arranged for early next week

I am wondering who you think should be included so that there is the right people on line ?  Please let me know if there are particular folks to be included

Thanks Anne

From: Valerie Bookwalter <bookwalt at jlab.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 14, 2020 10:51 AM
To: Tony Reilly <areilly at jlab.org>; E. Anne McEwen <mcewen at jlab.org>; Ed Daly <edaly at jlab.org>
Cc: pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org>; Kirk Davis <kdavis at jlab.org>; Naeem Huque <huque at jlab.org>; Katherine Wilson <kwilson at jlab.org>
Subject: SNSPPU Traveler Discussion / Frustration / Changes / Demands - Please help!
Importance: High

The Pansophy Team is having a really hard time with the Travelers' naming, email banters, exceptions, etc.
Could we please get a consensus on how you want us to run the Pansophy Traveler System???

We are tired of being beaten up, while trying to grow the system to support the demands and requests put on us by the projects and SOTRs.
We are doing this by renaming work centers and division/grouping of work. This is being done because of past experiences where we were drawn and quartered during end-of-project inventory inquiries and NCR validation of parts, QA Board metrics with Report Validations, Work Center traveler breakdowns.
If you do not want us to change the system (Traveler names, acronyms, work centers, etc.), then please let us know so we can stop trying so hard to do better. If I am leading the team down the wrong path, please tell me and I will stop!

I am looking to you for direction. Please can we meet? Or email? Or something? So we can get back to work...

Thank You.
Sincerely,
Valerie Bookwalter
Pansophy Team
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20201014/2af16fbb/attachment.html>