[Pansophy] SNS PPU SEC 01 vendor docs review

Gary Cheng cheng at jlab.org
Tue Apr 6 14:18:16 EDT 2021


Hi Mike,

I will then use DCXCUSN in my travelers and not asking to upload sensor 
data since they are already uploaded in SNSPPU-INV-DCXCU.

Thanks,
Gary


On 4/6/2021 12:05 PM, Mike Dickey wrote:
>
> Hi Gary,
>
> The curve data is attached to the SNSPPU-INV-DCXCU travelers for all 
> 266 of the Cernox sensors.  The drop down is DCXCUSN and will give you 
> a list of all of the sensors.
>
> There should be no need to zip the folders in M:\SNS_PPU\CM 
> Production\Cernox Curves\All Cernox and attach them to another traveler.
>
> Mike Dickey
>
> SRF Inventory Technician
>
> Jefferson Lab
> 12000 Jefferson Ave
> Newport News, VA 23606
> (757) 269-7755
>
> *From:*Gary Cheng <cheng at jlab.org>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 6, 2021 12:01 PM
> *To:* Peter Owen <powen at jlab.org>; Larry King <king at jlab.org>
> *Cc:* srfinv at jlab.org; pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org>; Naeem Huque 
> <huque at jlab.org>; Ed Daly <edaly at jlab.org>; John Fischer 
> <fischer at jlab.org>
> *Subject:* Re: SNS PPU SEC 01 vendor docs review
>
> Peter,
>
> Yes, I will mention in the travlers the M:\ folder for all curves and 
> ask that the .zip should be uploaded.
>
> Thanks,
> Gary
>
> On 4/6/2021 11:55 AM, Peter Owen wrote:
>
>     Gary,
>
>     I like this system. The traveler should specify that the *.zip
>     file should be uploaded for a sensor since that contains all curve
>     file types. You may want to mention in the traveler that the
>     master copy of all curves is stored on the M: drive. Though maybe
>     not everyone has access to that folder.
>
>     M:\SNS_PPU\CM Production\Cernox Curves\All Cernox
>
>     Peter
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>     *From:*Gary Cheng <cheng at jlab.org> <mailto:cheng at jlab.org>
>     *Sent:* Tuesday, April 6, 2021 11:46 AM
>     *To:* Peter Owen <powen at jlab.org> <mailto:powen at jlab.org>; Larry
>     King <king at jlab.org> <mailto:king at jlab.org>
>     *Cc:* srfinv at jlab.org <mailto:srfinv at jlab.org> <srfinv at jlab.org>
>     <mailto:srfinv at jlab.org>; pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org>
>     <mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>; Naeem Huque <huque at jlab.org>
>     <mailto:huque at jlab.org>; Ed Daly <edaly at jlab.org>
>     <mailto:edaly at jlab.org>; John Fischer <fischer at jlab.org>
>     <mailto:fischer at jlab.org>
>     *Subject:* Re: SNS PPU SEC 01 vendor docs review
>
>     I need to finalize the newest revisions of  my SEC and REC
>     inspection travelers before the next end can(s) show up. I'd like
>     to get a consensus on what we want to do with the Cernox curves
>     for the end can sensors. Each SEC has 2 sensors and each REC has
>     10. We sent to the end can vendor a total of 84 sensors to be
>     installed on 7 SECs and 7 RECs. Vendor will send us information
>     about which sensors (S/Ns) are installed on which SEC/REC at what
>     locations (wires labelled with  wiring diagram sensor naming
>     convention, such as TDxx022A).
>
>     To link each SEC or REC with its specific sensors and facilitate
>     pansophy search of the data curves for use in shipping traveler in
>     the end, here is what I propose to do in regard to Cernox sensors
>     & data curves, responsible parties are identified:
>
>     1. Create a dropdown list of the S/Ns for all 84 sensors that were
>     sent to the end can vendor ----*SRFINV team or Pansophy team*
>     2. For each SEC or REC, check vendor documentation for sensors
>     actually installed. Also verify the labels on wires are correct.
>     --- *SRF Instrumentation team*
>     3. Traveler will have a fileupload for each Cernox sensor. That
>     is, SNSPPU-CMA-INSP-SEC will have 2 dropdowns and 2 fileuploads,
>     SNSPPU-CMA-INSP-REC will have 10 dropdowns and 10 fileuploads.
>     ---- *Gary Cheng*
>     4. Select the Cernox S/N and upload the corresponding curve. ---
>     *SRF Instrumentation team*
>
>     To select 2 or 10 sensors from 84 S/Ns, locate their curves and
>     upload them can be a tedious process. Any better ideas are
>     welcome. Note that we don't know what sensors the vendor installs
>     on a SEC or REC till they are done with their installation.
>     Currently, we get the sensor installation info when we receive the
>     final documentation package for a certain SEC/REC.
>
>     Thanks,
>     Gary
>
>     On 3/16/2021 3:07 PM, Peter Owen wrote:
>
>         The files are saved in the DCXCU inventory traveler. I've made
>         sure every traveler filed out has files attached, either
>         individual or the zip. I pulled them to the M: folder so I
>         could get a list of values for Gary to send to the EC vendor.
>         Calvin said he downloaded the curves straight from the
>         Lakeshore website, so I expect we could get the curves again
>         if they are lost.
>
>         I see no problem with storing the curves in as many places as
>         possible in what ever format is most appropriate, as long as
>         we know which one is the master set. I think the inventory
>         traveler should be that set.
>
>         Peter
>
>         ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>         *From:*Larry King <king at jlab.org> <mailto:king at jlab.org>
>         *Sent:* Tuesday, March 16, 2021 2:28 PM
>         *To:* Peter Owen <powen at jlab.org> <mailto:powen at jlab.org>;
>         Gary Cheng <cheng at jlab.org> <mailto:cheng at jlab.org>
>         *Subject:* RE: SNS PPU SEC 01 vendor docs review
>
>         Hi Peter,
>
>         I guess I vote for having a step to upload the individual
>         curves to the EC receiving traveler. Not wanting to belabor
>         the point, I’m just going to lay out my logic.  There may be
>         another, better way, and I realize I may be missing something,
>         so please just take these as suggestions.
>
>         -The .zip files are probably what we need to deliver to ORNL
>         with the CM, so we need to be sure we have one for every
>         sensor installed.  I think that check should happen early on,
>         like during EC receipt.  We had a few sensors for L2 that we
>         could not find curves for and it took a while for FNAL to find
>         them for us.
>
>         -The .dat files are needed for CMTF cooldown.  Ideally, there
>         would be links already in the CM Assy or Testing traveler,
>         pointing to the EC receiving traveler.
>
>         -The .zip files will need to eventually make it to the
>         shipping traveler for delivery to ORNL.  It seems easier to
>         have the shipping traveler grab the data from the CM ASSY or
>         EC receiving traveler.
>
>         -I also seem to remember being told that we should try to move
>         away from relying on shared drive folders for critical
>         customer data, so a traveler may be a better place to keep all
>         these curves.
>
>         Thoughts?
>
>         Regards,
>
>         Larry
>
>         *From:*Peter Owen <powen at jlab.org> <mailto:powen at jlab.org>
>         *Sent:* Tuesday, March 16, 2021 1:35 PM
>         *To:* Gary Cheng <cheng at jlab.org> <mailto:cheng at jlab.org>;
>         Larry King <king at jlab.org> <mailto:king at jlab.org>
>         *Subject:* Re: SNS PPU SEC 01 vendor docs review
>
>         The curves are saved in M:\SNS_PPU\CM Production\Cernox
>         Curves\All Cernox
>
>         I made that folder over the summer when we send cernox to the
>         end can vendor. Which file type should be uploaded to the
>         traveler? The .zip has all the other files inside.
>         Alternatively, could the pansophy team pull the appropriate
>         file from the inventory traveler after the serial number is
>         entered?
>
>         Peter
>
>         ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>         *From:*Gary Cheng <cheng at jlab.org <mailto:cheng at jlab.org>>
>         *Sent:* Tuesday, March 16, 2021 11:37 AM
>         *To:* Larry King <king at jlab.org <mailto:king at jlab.org>>; Peter
>         Owen <powen at jlab.org <mailto:powen at jlab.org>>
>         *Subject:* Re: SNS PPU SEC 01 vendor docs review
>
>         Hi Larry,
>
>         Peter bought all Cernox sensors for SNS PPU and we sent 84
>         Cernox sensors as GFMs to the end can vendor. So we have the
>         calc curves. Currently in the traveler's Step 3, there are
>         fields for comments and file upload:
>
>
>
>         Maybe Peter or you can use these two to either make a comment
>         about where to find the full calc curves for the sensors
>         installed on a certain SEC or upload the curves? If you'd like
>         to have another specific fileupload button just for the
>         curves, I can add that. Please let me know.
>
>         Thanks,
>         Gary
>
>         On 3/15/2021 4:59 PM, Larry King wrote:
>
>             Hi Gary,
>
>             The only problem with waiting until the CMTF testing
>             traveler to enter the curves is that they might be
>             missing.  Since the data is supposed to come from the
>             vendor, I think the files should be uploaded sooner than
>             later, in case there’s a problem.  My thought was that the
>             “check Cernox data” step of the inspection traveler was to
>             check that the files were available for each serial number
>             of sensor installed, and either upload the files or
>             provide a link to them.
>
>             Regards,
>
>             Larry
>
>             *From:*Gary Cheng <cheng at jlab.org> <mailto:cheng at jlab.org>
>             *Sent:* Friday, March 12, 2021 2:22 PM
>             *To:* Larry King <king at jlab.org> <mailto:king at jlab.org>;
>             Peter Owen <powen at jlab.org> <mailto:powen at jlab.org>
>             *Subject:* Re: SNS PPU SEC 01 vendor docs review
>
>             Hi Larry and Peter,
>
>             I am working on a new revision of the SNSPPU-CMA-INSP-SEC
>             traveler and the first version of SNSPPU-CMA-INSP-REC.
>             Each SEC has 2 Cernox sensors and each REC has 10. Do you
>             think it is necessary to attach full cal curves to the
>             CMA-INSP travelers? Maybe they are more appropriate to
>             include in the CM testing traveler?
>
>             Thanks,
>             Gary
>
>             On 3/11/2021 3:40 PM, Larry King wrote:
>
>                 Hi Peter,
>
>                 I was looking for the Cernox curves for the 2 sensors
>                 in the SEC 01 end can.  I found the spreadsheet of all
>                 of the room temperature values,
>
>                 https://jlabdoc.jlab.org/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-239158/Nominal%20Cernox%20Values.xlsx
>                 <https://jlabdoc.jlab.org/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-239158/Nominal%20Cernox%20Values.xlsx>
>
>                 and I assume those data points were taken from the
>                 full cal curves, but I don’t see the cal curves in the
>                 traveler.
>
>                 https://pansophy.jlab.org/pansophy/Travelers/TRAVELER_FORM.cfm?project=SNSPPU&area=SNSPPU&system=CMA&TRAV_ID=SNSPPU-CMA-SEC-INSP&TRAV_REVISION=R2&page=1&maxpage=5&TRAV_SEQ_NUM=1&ncr_num=.&travstat=n&serialnum=001&SN=001&SNType=SECSN
>                 <https://pansophy.jlab.org/pansophy/Travelers/TRAVELER_FORM.cfm?project=SNSPPU&area=SNSPPU&system=CMA&TRAV_ID=SNSPPU-CMA-SEC-INSP&TRAV_REVISION=R2&page=1&maxpage=5&TRAV_SEQ_NUM=1&ncr_num=.&travstat=n&serialnum=001&SN=001&SNType=SECSN>
>
>                 They’re also not in the vendor-received document
>                 dump/pdf pile.  Do you have them all in one big folder
>                 somewhere?
>
>                 They will need to be available for CMTF cooldowns, and
>                 delivered to ORNL.  I would prefer that we loaded the
>                 relevant curves into each traveler, but pointing to a
>                 common folder would work, too.
>
>                 Thanks,
>
>                 Larry
>
>                 *From:*Peter Owen <powen at jlab.org>
>                 <mailto:powen at jlab.org>
>                 *Sent:* Thursday, March 4, 2021 2:08 PM
>                 *To:* Gary Cheng <cheng at jlab.org>
>                 <mailto:cheng at jlab.org>; Larry King <king at jlab.org>
>                 <mailto:king at jlab.org>
>                 *Subject:* Re: SNS PPU SEC 01 vendor docs review
>
>                 Hi Gary,
>
>                 I think Meyer had their instrument set to kilo-ohms
>                 rather than ohms on 10/17/20, so the numbers are
>                 1/1000th of what I expect. Other than that, the
>                 measurements look good. I only saw data for two
>                 sensors, 149779 and 149777. Are there other sensors to
>                 check?
>
>                 Peter
>
>                 ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 *From:*Gary Cheng <cheng at jlab.org <mailto:cheng at jlab.org>>
>                 *Sent:* Thursday, March 4, 2021 8:19 AM
>                 *To:* Kurt Macha <macha at jlab.org
>                 <mailto:macha at jlab.org>>; Jenord Alston
>                 <jalston at jlab.org <mailto:jalston at jlab.org>>; Mark
>                 Wiseman <wiseman at jlab.org <mailto:wiseman at jlab.org>>;
>                 Peter Owen <powen at jlab.org <mailto:powen at jlab.org>>;
>                 John Fischer <fischer at jlab.org <mailto:fischer at jlab.org>>
>                 *Cc:* Larry King <king at jlab.org
>                 <mailto:king at jlab.org>>; Naeem Huque <huque at jlab.org
>                 <mailto:huque at jlab.org>>; Ed Daly <edaly at jlab.org
>                 <mailto:edaly at jlab.org>>; Melissa Torres
>                 <torres at jlab.org <mailto:torres at jlab.org>>;
>                 srfinv at jlab.org <mailto:srfinv at jlab.org>
>                 <srfinv at jlab.org <mailto:srfinv at jlab.org>>; Matt
>                 Marchlik <marchlik at jlab.org <mailto:marchlik at jlab.org>>
>                 *Subject:* Re: SNS PPU SEC 01 vendor docs review
>
>                 Dear all,
>
>                 This is a reminder that vendor docs need to be
>                 reviewed. Your comments will be shared with the vendor
>                 so changes will be made in future documentation pacakges.
>                 Jenord has made his comments on the welding docs.
>                 Here is the list of lead reviewers and the backups:
>
>                 Sections 1, 2 & 6 --- Gary Cheng/Daly/Marchlik
>                 Section 3 --- Macha/Fischer/Cheng
>                 Section 4 --- Fischer/Naeem/Cheng
>                 Section 5 --- Alston/Fischer
>                 Section 7 --- Owen/King
>
>                 Thanks,
>                 Gary
>
>                 On 2/24/2021 11:45 AM, Gary Cheng wrote:
>
>                     For folks who need charge code, please use PUSECP
>                     for supply end cans and PUREPR for return end cans
>                     Thanks!
>                     Gary
>
>                     On 2/24/2021 11:30 AM, Gary Cheng wrote:
>
>                         Hi all,
>
>                         I need your help to review SEC 01 vendor
>                         documents that can be found at
>                         M:\SNS_PPU\Procurement\VendorDocuments\5_End
>                         Cans\SEC 01
>
>
>                         Note that the first file has everything in it.
>                         I split the sections to make it easier for you
>                         to find the relevant docs. Here is how the
>                         sections would be divided to each reviewer(s),
>                         with primary/backup:
>
>                         Sections 1, 2 & 6 --- Gary Cheng/Daly/Marchlik
>                         Section 3 --- Macha/Fischer/Cheng
>                         Section 4 --- Fischer/Naeem/Cheng
>                         Section 5 --- Alston/Fischer
>                         Section 7 --- Owen/King
>
>                         You are also expected to check docs for SEC
>                         02-07 and REC 01-07. Once relevant travelers
>                         are open, I will remind you to fill up the
>                         traveler's vendor doc review step.
>
>                         FYI, drawings and SOW can be found at
>                         M:\SNS_PPU\Procurement\Info for Procurement
>                         Packages\End Can. The SOW defines what we
>                         expect the vendor to submit. If you have
>                         questions, please let me know.
>
>                         We need to feed back to the vendor asap on
>                         missing/incorrect docs. So I would appreciate
>                         if you can look through the relevant docs and
>                         feedback to me by end of Friday 2/26 or let me
>                         know when you can finish.
>
>                         Thanks,
>                         Gary
>
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20210406/8ff05d40/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 4554 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20210406/8ff05d40/attachment-0003.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 10667 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20210406/8ff05d40/attachment-0004.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 9944 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20210406/8ff05d40/attachment-0005.png>


More information about the Pansophy mailing list