[Pansophy] HE VTA traveler

[Katherine Wilson]

Sounds good, thank you all!

________________________________
From: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2021 8:57 AM
To: Katherine Wilson <kwilson at jlab.org>
Cc: pansophy at jlab.org <pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: RE: HE VTA traveler


Thanks. We’ve routed a procedure for that unlinked reference. We’ll put it in once the procedure is approved.



From: Katherine Wilson <kwilson at jlab.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2021 8:48 AM
To: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org>
Cc: pansophy at jlab.org
Subject: Re: HE VTA traveler



Hi, I don't see any changes in my version, so I'm not sure why you do.  I am attaching a new version with Track Changes turned off.



I can't explain all the highlighting, because that's left over from Kirk's original highlighting, but it does not indicate anything with regard to editing.  I think Kirk just likes highlights.



Thanks,

Katherine



________________________________

From: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org<mailto:samuels at jlab.org>>
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2021 8:51 AM
To: Katherine Wilson <kwilson at jlab.org<mailto:kwilson at jlab.org>>
Cc: pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org> <pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>>
Subject: RE: HE VTA traveler



For starters, track changes was still on, and showing a bunch of changes. There also was a bunch of highlighting throughout the traveler, including on the reference that didn’t have a link attached to it. Normally I wouldn’t think too deeply into either, but the two together gave me the feeling of incompleteness. This could just be me overthinking things, but I wanted to check to be sure.



Allen



From: Katherine Wilson <kwilson at jlab.org<mailto:kwilson at jlab.org>>
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2021 8:44 AM
To: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org<mailto:samuels at jlab.org>>
Cc: pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: HE VTA traveler



I don't know what you mean by "formatting that seems to suggest that it is not done yet."  Can you be more specific so I know what to fix?



Thanks,
Katherine



________________________________

From: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org<mailto:samuels at jlab.org>>
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2021 4:47 PM
To: Katherine Wilson <kwilson at jlab.org<mailto:kwilson at jlab.org>>
Cc: pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org> <pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>>
Subject: RE: HE VTA traveler



Katherine,



I was looking over the traveler before routing for approval. It looks mostly good, although I did have a question. One of the references, LCLSII VTA RF Testing Procedure, doesn’t have a link on it. In addition, it has some formatting that seems to suggest that it is not done yet. I also noticed similar formatting elsewhere in the traveler, and wanted to ensure that these are intentional. If this is a mistake, please update the traveler and upload the new version.



Allen



From: Pansophy <pansophy-bounces at mailman.jlab.org<mailto:pansophy-bounces at mailman.jlab.org>> On Behalf Of Katherine Wilson
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2021 2:45 PM
To: pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>>
Cc: John Hogan <hogan at jlab.org<mailto:hogan at jlab.org>>; Ari Palczewski <ari at jlab.org<mailto:ari at jlab.org>>
Subject: [Pansophy] HE VTA traveler



Dear all,



The HE cavity VTA traveler is ready for approval.



Thanks,

Katherine


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20210415/738ea393/attachment-0001.html>