[Pansophy] A piezo by any other name
Mike Dickey
mdickey at jlab.org
Wed Apr 28 09:31:27 EDT 2021
Hi Larry,
This is another case where, back in the C100 days, the piezo acronym was PIEZO, but was changed by the traveler writer for L2PRD. I missed the TUNPZ when the parts arrived and we got a little rushed.
The basic thinking behind this is that parts should have an acronym separate from the assembly. Piezos (PIEZO) and stepper motors (SM) only go on the tuner, so why be redundant with the naming. HMFT and FPFT only go on the cavity and we don't use CAVHMFT or CAVFPFT. Just trying to normalize things for consistency.
Mike Dickey
SRF Inventory Technician
Jefferson Lab
12000 Jefferson Ave
Newport News, VA 23606
(757) 269-7755
From: Pansophy <pansophy-bounces at mailman.jlab.org> On Behalf Of Larry King
Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 3:32 PM
To: pansophy at jlab.org
Cc: Peter Owen <powen at jlab.org>
Subject: [Pansophy] A piezo by any other name
Good afternoon,
Another part name question; this time for the piezo element used on the tuner. Primes vartype is TUNPZSN, but that abbreviation isn't in the drop-down on the Pansophy ribbon. The MasterTravelerList says the traveler is to be named L2HE-INSP-TUNPZ. Since TUNMT became SM, I was just checking to see if there's an new name for this part as well, or if TUNPZ is just missing from the Pansophy ribbon?
Thanks,
Larry
vartype: TUNPZSN
partnumber: FC0046546
partname: PIEZO
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20210428/3591e0dd/attachment.html>
More information about the Pansophy
mailing list