[Pansophy] Doglegs for C75 vs NbSn

[E. Anne McEwen]

Hi all
Just a thought, the dogleg are C75 design (not special for NbSn whereas the cavities have a special coating and so wil be NbSn), if  it is decided tge DL are not suitable for NbSn, they could be still returned to C 75, at which point all data would have to get moved to C75 DL
So I wonder if we would want to keep the DL under C75 and only record the Serisl numbers in the final Pair Assy traveler for what was actually used in the end
Just my 2 cents, perhaps could decide in the c75 meeting at 1 pm
Regardless Aaron will need the SN added to the travelers

Best Anne

Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36>

________________________________
From: Danny Forehand <forehand at jlab.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 10:41:49 AM
To: George DeKerlegand <georged at jlab.org>; E. Anne McEwen <mcewen at jlab.org>; Kurt Macha <macha at jlab.org>
Cc: pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: Doglegs

Nb3Sn


Regards,
Danny Forehand
SRF Cavity Production Team
[cid:196ea063-e251-4b4b-8a35-75bebb0f1e9d]


________________________________
From: George DeKerlegand <georged at jlab.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 9:53 AM
To: E. Anne McEwen <mcewen at jlab.org>; Kurt Macha <macha at jlab.org>; Danny Forehand <forehand at jlab.org>
Cc: pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: Doglegs

Hi all,

Should dogleg DL-2 and DL-17 data go into NB3Sn or C75 project?

Thanks,
Aaron
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20210223/dc13863d/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Outlook-khp2krlx.png
Type: image/png
Size: 7025 bytes
Desc: Outlook-khp2krlx.png
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20210223/dc13863d/attachment.png>