[Pansophy] L2HE-INSP-CLMP02K

[Lakshmi Lalitha]

Allen,
Step #2.3 is not intended to replace NCR. The purpose is to capture all observations for subsequent review, based on which we can decide if at all we need a separate NCR.
This was my thought behind it.

If you have any further concerns, please let me know. We can work through it.

Thank you
Lakshmi

Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10

From: Allen Samuels<mailto:samuels at jlab.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 8, 2021 1:43 PM
To: Lakshmi Lalitha<mailto:lalitha at jlab.org>
Cc: pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: L2HE-INSP-CLMP02K

Lakshmi,

I was working on the L2HE-INSP-CLMP02K traveler to get it in to pansophy, when I noticed what you put on step 2.3
[cid:image001.png at 01D773FE.494B5480]
I was wondering if you were familiar with our NCR system? It is built to handle and track the non-conformances of a component and this step may be confusing to the techs performing the inspection. If it is being used for nonconformance reporting, can it be replaced by our system already in place?


Allen

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20210708/5247f77c/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 15730 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20210708/5247f77c/attachment-0001.png>