[Pansophy] L2HE-INSP-CLMP02K - Question about NCR in traveler

[Lakshmi Lalitha]

Hi Jacob,
Thanks for your reply. Can I call you and Valerie at 9.00 am tomorrow? I will send you a team meeting request soon.

Lakshmi


Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10

From: Jacob Harris<mailto:jharris at jlab.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 8, 2021 3:05 PM
To: Valerie Bookwalter<mailto:bookwalt at jlab.org>; Lakshmi Lalitha<mailto:lalitha at jlab.org>
Cc: pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>; Katherine Wilson<mailto:kwilson at jlab.org>
Subject: RE: L2HE-INSP-CLMP02K - Question about NCR in traveler

Hi Lakshmi,

As Valerie noted, our NCR system is built to handle potentially nonconforming parts and allow the engineer/tech rep to evaluate and disposition appropriately. A screening step in a traveler would bypass the engineer/tech as there is no hold point to require the engineer to evaluate the condition of the potentially nonconforming part.

Feel free to reach me on Teams if a discussion is helpful.

Jacob

From: Valerie Bookwalter
Sent: Thursday, July 8, 2021 2:47 PM
To: Lakshmi Lalitha <lalitha at jlab.org>; Jacob Harris <jharris at jlab.org>
Cc: pansophy at jlab.org; Katherine Wilson <kwilson at jlab.org>
Subject: RE: L2HE-INSP-CLMP02K - Question about NCR in traveler

Lakshmi,

L2HE has some very specific NCR requirements and a new version of the L2HE-NCR traveler was just released.
Jacob Harris is SRFOPS’ Quality Engineer and would have the most information about NCR requirements.
This proposal, which is asking for a preliminary non-conformance check outside of the NCR traveler, is not in line with our current NCR procedure. An NCR is initiated if a part is suspect of a non-conformance at which time you, as engineer / Tech Rep, can then denote it as acceptable or not.
If you would like to discuss this further please reach out to me via teams OR reach out to Jacob (jharris) for clarification.

Jacob, Please chime in on if this is acceptable.


Valerie Bookwalter
Jefferson Lab, SRF Department
Pansophy Team
1-757-813-6716 (CELL)
1-767-269-5802 (OFFICE – currently working offsite)



From: Pansophy <pansophy-bounces at mailman.jlab.org<mailto:pansophy-bounces at mailman.jlab.org>> On Behalf Of Lakshmi Lalitha
Sent: Thursday, July 8, 2021 1:52 PM
To: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org<mailto:samuels at jlab.org>>
Cc: pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: [Pansophy] L2HE-INSP-CLMP02K

Allen,
Step #2.3 is not intended to replace NCR. The purpose is to capture all observations for subsequent review, based on which we can decide if at all we need a separate NCR.
This was my thought behind it.

If you have any further concerns, please let me know. We can work through it.

Thank you
Lakshmi

Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10

From: Allen Samuels<mailto:samuels at jlab.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 8, 2021 1:43 PM
To: Lakshmi Lalitha<mailto:lalitha at jlab.org>
Cc: pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: L2HE-INSP-CLMP02K

Lakshmi,

I was working on the L2HE-INSP-CLMP02K traveler to get it in to pansophy, when I noticed what you put on step 2.3
[cid:image001.png at 01D77408.F8775710]
I was wondering if you were familiar with our NCR system? It is built to handle and track the non-conformances of a component and this step may be confusing to the techs performing the inspection. If it is being used for nonconformance reporting, can it be replaced by our system already in place?


Allen


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20210708/46e39039/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 15730 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20210708/46e39039/attachment-0001.png>