[Pansophy] C100R masterlist

Gary Cheng cheng at jlab.org
Mon Jun 7 10:32:06 EDT 2021


Hi Allen,

Line 90 is definitely not needed. I think Lines 96,97 and 98 can be 
removed too. Reason being that C100R magnetic shields will be reused, 
unless there are pieces damaged too badly and we would need to buy new. 
But until that actually happens, we will not need mag shield receiving 
inspection travelers.

Thanks,
Gary

On 6/4/2021 3:37 PM, Allen Samuels wrote:
>
> Gary,
>
> I’ve been working with John Fisher to reduce the number of C100 
> travelers we need to move to C100R. He’s been good to narrow the list 
> considerably, but there’s a few he directed me to ask you about. Would 
> you be able to look at these and tell me if they are necessary? Please 
> pay special attention to lines 90 and 96. They seem to be the same 
> traveler, and 90 doesn’t even exist in pansophy, but I didn’t want to 
> delete it without you seeing it first (Actually pretty sure both are 
> completely wrong, but I’m a bit off today and I’m not totally able to 
> figure it out).
>
> You can find the travelers John pointed out by their highlights in the 
> G column. If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to reach out.
>
> Allen
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20210607/297923d0/attachment.html>


More information about the Pansophy mailing list