[Pansophy] SRFOPS-PR-CLNRM-LEAK Procedure

[Allen Samuels]

That is correct. It is the latest template for procedures

From: David Savransky <dsavr at jlab.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 9, 2021 11:34 AM
To: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org>
Cc: pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: SRFOPS-PR-CLNRM-LEAK Procedure

Hi Allen,

Thank you for updating it to the new format!! I made a few small changes to the procedure (new procedure attached).

For future reference, should I use the pansophy procedure template instead of the procedure template to write the new procedures?

Thank you,

David S.


________________________________
From: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org<mailto:samuels at jlab.org>>
Sent: Tuesday, November 9, 2021 11:17 AM
To: David Savransky <dsavr at jlab.org<mailto:dsavr at jlab.org>>
Cc: pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>>
Subject: RE: SRFOPS-PR-CLNRM-LEAK Procedure


David,



Here is the procedure in the new template. Please look it over and let me know if it is good and ready to be routed.



Allen



From: Pansophy <pansophy-bounces at mailman.jlab.org<mailto:pansophy-bounces at mailman.jlab.org>> On Behalf Of Allen Samuels
Sent: Tuesday, November 9, 2021 10:40 AM
To: David Savransky <dsavr at jlab.org<mailto:dsavr at jlab.org>>
Cc: pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>>
Subject: Re: [Pansophy] SRFOPS-PR-CLNRM-LEAK Procedure



David,



Thank you very much for your work on this. Unfortunately, as I'm looking it over, it appears this is in an older procedure template and will need to be moved into the latest one. I am working on that right now and will send it to you before approval to make sure it is acceptable to you, unless you would prefer to head up the operation.



Allen



From: David Savransky <dsavr at jlab.org<mailto:dsavr at jlab.org>>
Sent: Tuesday, November 9, 2021 9:25 AM
To: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org<mailto:samuels at jlab.org>>
Cc: pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>>
Subject: Re: SRFOPS-PR-CLNRM-LEAK Procedure



Hi Allen,



I just dropped it into the ready for approvals folder. (link<https://jlabdoc.jlab.org/docushare/dsweb/Services/Document-250620>)



David S.

________________________________

From: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org<mailto:samuels at jlab.org>>
Sent: Tuesday, November 9, 2021 9:17 AM
To: David Savransky <dsavr at jlab.org<mailto:dsavr at jlab.org>>
Cc: pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>>
Subject: RE: SRFOPS-PR-CLNRM-LEAK Procedure



Hi David,



Drop it in the same folder as last time. But if you don't mind, would you please send me a link to that folder once you put it in? This is a new area and I'd like to make sure I got my notifications set up right for it.



Allen



From: David Savransky <dsavr at jlab.org<mailto:dsavr at jlab.org>>
Sent: Tuesday, November 9, 2021 9:15 AM
To: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org<mailto:samuels at jlab.org>>
Cc: pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>>
Subject: SRFOPS-PR-CLNRM-LEAK Procedure



Hi Allen,



If I wanted to re-upload the SRFOPS-PR-CLNRM-LEAK procedure after it was denied, would I drop it in the ready for approvals folder under the same name, or would there be a different process?



Thank you,



David S.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20211109/b12cec3f/attachment.html>