[Pansophy] SRFOPS-PR-CMTF-CM-EPICS

[Ashley Anderson Mitchell]

Yes, that's correct.

________________________________
From: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2021 11:02 AM
To: Ashley Anderson Mitchell <ashleya at jlab.org>
Cc: pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: RE: SRFOPS-PR-CMTF-CM-EPICS


Correct. So your procedure is good to go in once the changes are made?



Allen



From: Ashley Anderson Mitchell <ashleya at jlab.org>
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2021 11:01 AM
To: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org>
Cc: pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: SRFOPS-PR-CMTF-CM-EPICS



Thanks Allen,

That other procedure should be David's

________________________________

From: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org<mailto:samuels at jlab.org>>
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2021 11:00 AM
To: Ashley Anderson Mitchell <ashleya at jlab.org<mailto:ashleya at jlab.org>>
Cc: pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>>
Subject: RE: SRFOPS-PR-CMTF-CM-EPICS



Ashley, I was looking at the wrong document. Yours is SRFOPS-PR-CLNRM-TOOL-SPCLMP, and was put in mid October. It’ll be renamed SRF-MSPR-CLNRM-TOOL-SPCLMP. Everything else in the email is correct. So sorry for the confusion.



Allen



From: Pansophy <pansophy-bounces at mailman.jlab.org<mailto:pansophy-bounces at mailman.jlab.org>> On Behalf Of Allen Samuels
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2021 10:58 AM
To: Ashley Anderson Mitchell <ashleya at jlab.org<mailto:ashleya at jlab.org>>
Cc: pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>>
Subject: [Pansophy] SRFOPS-PR-CMTF-CM-EPICS



Ashley,



I was working in the SRFOPS area when I noticed that SRFOPS-PR-CMTF-CM-EPICS was still sitting in there from mid October. I think it got lost in the shuffle, that was a very busy period, but I wanted to be sure that was what happened, and not that something else had happened. Do you remember any reason I shouldn’t route it now?



If it is ready for routing, a couple things will need to happen. First; the area got renamed to SRF, and instead of PR it needs to be called MSPR for Master Procedure. Second; It is in an old procedure template and will need to be updated. I can do that and send it back to you to make sure it’s good before I route it, or you can do it. Whichever you’d prefer.



Thank you for your time,



Allen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20211110/89f64d15/attachment.html>