[Pansophy] L2HE-CLNRM-AMGV-LEAK-R1

[Allen Samuels]

Thank you for the reminder, David. The procedure looks good, but the reviewer section is blank. Please either upload a new version with the names and their titles, or give them to me and I will put them in.

Allen

From: David Savransky <dsavr at jlab.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2021 4:28 PM
To: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org>
Cc: pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: L2HE-CLNRM-AMGV-LEAK-R1

Hi Allen,

The procedure for that link has not be approved yet so I did not know how to link it.  The procedure was the document I was submitted for approvals along with this traveler, the name of it is SRFOPS-PR-CLNRM- LEAK. (link<https://jlabdoc.jlab.org/docushare/dsweb/Services/Document-248734>)

Sorry for the confusion.

David S.



________________________________
From: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org<mailto:samuels at jlab.org>>
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2021 3:55 PM
To: David Savransky <dsavr at jlab.org<mailto:dsavr at jlab.org>>
Cc: pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>>
Subject: L2HE-CLNRM-AMGV-LEAK-R1


David,



I've been looking over your L2HE-CLNRM-AMGV-LEAK-R1 traveler prior to routing. I had a question about the references. The "Leak testing with a RGA procedure". There isn't a link to this reference and I have been unable to find the document it's supposed to link to. I was able to find a link<https://jlabdoc.jlab.org/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-27678/CP-C100-CAV-LKTS.pdf> from an older version of this traveler from L2PRD, but I'm not sure we should be using an outdated procedure. What are your thoughts?



Allen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20211012/db8dc69e/attachment-0001.html>