[Pansophy] Draft - L2HE CAVSN discussion

[Mike Dickey]

Hi,

That sounds great.

The only thing I would add is that if the same part/serial number is already in PRIMeS inventory, the system will not allow us to receive duplicates.  So since (L2PRD) 0040 has not been issued and is still in inventory, we will not be able to receive (L2HE) 0040 into the system.

Mike Dickey
SRF Inventory Technician
Jefferson Lab
12000 Jefferson Ave
Newport News, VA 23606
(757) 269-7755

From: Valerie Bookwalter <bookwalt at jlab.org>
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2021 2:13 PM
To: Megan McDonald <megan at jlab.org>; pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org>; Mike Dickey <mdickey at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: Draft - L2HE CAVSN discussion

Megan,

That sounds good to me.

@Mike Dickey<mailto:mdickey at jlab.org>
any other comments to be added?

V
________________________________
From: Pansophy <pansophy-bounces at mailman.jlab.org<mailto:pansophy-bounces at mailman.jlab.org>> on behalf of Megan McDonald <megan at jlab.org<mailto:megan at jlab.org>>
Sent: Friday, September 17, 2021 12:23 PM
To: pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>>
Subject: [Pansophy] Draft - L2HE CAVSN discussion


Feel free to edit (put changes in a different color plz)



I have generated a new report that shows the cavity specifications for HE. I know that the cavities listed in the report already are refurbished cavities that are coming from the L2PRD project and that some have been renamed with a preceding "HE-". This is causing some concern for me with traceability and with the new cavities that will come in, with I imagine the same "HE-" and the cavities numbers starting at 001. With this, we will run into duplicate names (HE-040 as the cavity from L2PRD and HE-040 as the new cavity for L2HE).  I know that the HE was added for the planning meetings but I also know that the cavities from L2PRD are inscribed as "0040". Changing the name to something different from what is inscribed on the component will cause confusion in other work centers (chemistry, assembly, etc), as that will not match what is in the dropdown.

As some may recall, we ran into some issues with traceability towards the end of L2PRD. We should maintain the same serial number that a component has been named throughout the 2 projects, so in the future, or present, when datamining is needed to see what processes the cavity has gone through, we have some sort of continuity between projects, especially when using the Serial Number Search which will show every traveler a cavity has been selected in, even across multiple projects.

I am proposing that the cavities that are from L2PRD, that have been renamed only in the database, should have the serial number dropdowns in the database match what is inscribed on the cavity to maintain traceability of that cavity and to avoid any future duplicate names or confusion.



Megan McDonald

Office - (757) 269-7641

Cell - (757) 234-1604


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20210917/0cc61c92/attachment.html>