[Pansophy] C75 vs NB3SN travelers

Tue Sep 21 13:51:05 EDT 2021

Hello all

We discussed the problem of NB3SN Cavity SN appearing in both C75 and NB3SN Travelers  in today's C75 meeting , to summarize the discussions

1.       Kirk confirms that Uttar is now the SME for NB3SN (replaced Kurt Macha who replaced Grigory ) . Note to the Pansophy team : Please add Uttar to the drop downs for the NB3SN travelers so that he can see the travelers and can  approve NCRs D3s etc.

2.       In the meeting we were told that some of the older travelers  are "legacy" , where data for NB3SN was put into C75 travelers because at the time there were no NB3SN travelers

3.       Kirk Davis said in the meeting that components like the Cavities (unique to NB3SN)  should be only going into NB3SN travelers , after the meeting I confirmed with Aaron that this had also been the instructions from Kurt Macha

4.       Our understanding is that data for "common Parts" that can be used on several styles of cryomodules  (C50, C75, NB3SN etc)  should be going into C75 Travelers

I hope this helps - so to address the immediate question  for NB3SN Cavity Inspections we will use the NB3SN Inspection traveler

Best wishes - Anne

From: Valerie Bookwalter <bookwalt at jlab.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2021 1:00 PM
To: E. Anne McEwen <mcewen at jlab.org>; SRF Pansophy (pansophy at jlab.org) <pansophy at jlab.org>
Cc: Earl Mosby <mosby at jlab.org>; George DeKerlegand <georged at jlab.org>; Kirk Davis <kdavis at jlab.org>; Gianluigi Ciovati <gciovati at jlab.org>; Tony Reilly <areilly at jlab.org>; Danny Forehand <forehand at jlab.org>; Ashley Anderson Mitchell <ashleya at jlab.org>
Subject: RE: [Pansophy] C75 vs NB3SN travelers

Anne,

You will have to ask the SMEs why they asked us to put those cavity numbers into C75.

Go to DATAMINE MENU -> QUERIES -> SERIAL NUMBER SEARCH

Under "Select Project(s)"  select C75 and hold the CNTRL key and select NB3SN
Then under "Type of SN" select CAVSN
Then select the Seral Number you want to see (5C75-RI-NBSN1)
It will show you everywhere that serial number has been used.
We can't keep track of why SMEs do this.. sorry
And until some Process Owners write up their areas... we have no course forward.

[cid:image002.jpg at 01D7AEEC.A7EC8710]

[cid:image005.jpg at 01D7AEEC.A7EC8710]

Valerie Bookwalter
Jefferson Lab, SRF Department
Pansophy Team
1-757-813-6716 (CELL)
1-757-269-5802 (OFFICE - currently working offsite)

From: Pansophy <pansophy-bounces at mailman.jlab.org<mailto:pansophy-bounces at mailman.jlab.org>> On Behalf Of E. Anne McEwen
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2021 12:48 PM
To: SRF Pansophy (pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>) <pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>>
Cc: Earl Mosby <mosby at jlab.org<mailto:mosby at jlab.org>>; George DeKerlegand <georged at jlab.org<mailto:georged at jlab.org>>
Subject: [Pansophy] C75 vs NB3SN travelers

Hello Pansophy Team ,

FYI-  It looks like the SN for NBSN are appearing in more than one Cavity Inspection Traveler (in both C75 and NB3SN )

Aaron is assuming we should use NB3SN

Anne

From: Earl Mosby <mosby at jlab.org<mailto:mosby at jlab.org>>
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2021 12:12 PM
To: George DeKerlegand <georged at jlab.org<mailto:georged at jlab.org>>; E. Anne McEwen <mcewen at jlab.org<mailto:mcewen at jlab.org>>
Subject: RE: Tie In

Got it.
Strange that Pansophy put the serial numbers for the NbSN1 & NbSN2 cavities in the C75 traveler dropdown.
I did not know it was under the WFO tab....

Earl

From: George DeKerlegand<mailto:georged at jlab.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2021 10:37 AM
To: Earl Mosby<mailto:mosby at jlab.org>; E. Anne McEwen<mailto:mcewen at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: Tie In

Hi Earl,

Thanks for info. I re-measured the cavity and it improved. The Fp end is now out .004" and FPC end is out of tol. .003" I will bend cavity again this morning. FYI it look like in pansophy NB3SN project has it's own home for data under "WFO" tab in pansophy. I believe this project data should be separated from C75.

Thanks,
Aaron

From: Earl Mosby <mosby at jlab.org<mailto:mosby at jlab.org>>
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 7:35 PM
To: E. Anne McEwen <mcewen at jlab.org<mailto:mcewen at jlab.org>>; George DeKerlegand <georged at jlab.org<mailto:georged at jlab.org>>
Subject: Tie In

Hi Anne & Aaron,

I have bent  C75 NbSN1.  I have the BT flanges within .004" in one direction and .003" 90° from CMM setup.

I think it is close enough to run.  I don't have time to run the program.  I sent an email to Roland to let him know that it needed bending.

Regards,

Earl

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20210921/4c97a887/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 81881 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20210921/4c97a887/attachment-0002.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image005.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 75210 bytes
Desc: image005.jpg
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20210921/4c97a887/attachment-0003.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image006.png
Type: image/png
Size: 144 bytes
Desc: image006.png
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20210921/4c97a887/attachment-0001.png>