[Pansophy] C100R Inspection Travelers

[E. Anne McEwen]

Hi Allen ,

 Could you send an example of what you are referring to - I began wondering after responding  if you are referring to the new shipping form .

Please note that there always will need to be an inspection done at receiving to check for shipping damage , and do a "count" to confirm all parts were received .

The quality inspection is more detailed, typically includes measurements  and may happen much later depending on work loads

Thanks Anne
________________________________
From: E. Anne McEwen
Sent: Friday, April 1, 2022 3:24 PM
To: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org>
Cc: pansophy at jlab.org <pansophy at jlab.org>; Earl Mosby <mosby at jlab.org>; George DeKerlegand <georged at jlab.org>
Subject: RE: C100R Inspection Travelers


Hi Allen –



In the past we have kept the inspection travelers separate from the receiving travelers , so my vole would be to keep then separate



I have put Aaron & earl on copy in case they have comments



Anne





From: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org>
Sent: Friday, April 1, 2022 3:01 PM
To: E. Anne McEwen <mcewen at jlab.org>
Cc: pansophy at jlab.org
Subject: C100R Inspection Travelers



Anne,



We were reviewing several C100R receiving inspection travelers; C100R-INSP-HELV, C100R-INSP-HESB, and C100R-INSP-HERB. We were concerned that they were a bit long and went past their scope as receiving inspections. It could get complicated with getting information from the people who run it. John Fischer is confident he can get his people to come to him, but what are your thoughts with the dimensional Inspection? Would you rather pull it into a separate traveler, or leave it as is?



Allen


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20220402/7446905a/attachment.html>