[Pansophy] L2HE-CMA-HOM-TUNE

[Peter Owen]

Hi Allen,

This looks good, thanks for looking into it!

Peter
________________________________
From: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 7, 2022 3:11 PM
To: Peter Owen <powen at jlab.org>
Cc: pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: RE: L2HE-CMA-HOM-TUNE


Thank you for your reply. I discussed it with Megan and she says we can do that. I will move the comment into the actual note fieldname.

As for the larger font, we can do that, but it doesn’t turn out that well. Instead, what we could do is make it its own row and turn the cell a different color. It would end up looking something like this.

[cid:image001.png at 01D84A91.C4650DE0]



Let us know what you think.



Allen



From: Peter Owen <powen at jlab.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2022 7:09 PM
To: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org>
Cc: pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: L2HE-CMA-HOM-TUNE



Hi Allen,

I assume you're talking about the C#_SN in steps 2, 10, etc. I left that field as a note for possible automatic scripting. Once the CMSN is set in step 1 and the position of each cavity is set on each page, the Cavity SN could automatically be filled in. The cavity SN would be picked from the HE string assembly traveler or another traveler where the order of cavities is recorded.

If that scripting isn't possible, the C#_SN field can be removed from each page. I had that idea a while ago, sorry I forgot to give you a heads up.



You may have noticed the number in a larger font size in step 2, 10, etc. Is this possible in Pansophy? I don't want the pages to get mixed up when filling out the traveler, hence the large indicator of which cavity to be measured.



Thanks,

Peter

________________________________

From: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org<mailto:samuels at jlab.org>>
Sent: Wednesday, April 6, 2022 5:01 PM
To: Peter Owen <powen at jlab.org<mailto:powen at jlab.org>>
Cc: pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>>
Subject: L2HE-CMA-HOM-TUNE



Peter,



I was reviewing the L2HE-CMA-HOM-TUNE traveler and had a question. The notes for each cavity position are written as comments. In addition, the question marks at the end seem to indicate that you weren’t certain about them yet. I can’t process the traveler with the comments still intact, their contents will have to be moved to the fieldname of the note. Are they ready as is to do so, sans the question mark?



Allen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20220408/889b37ad/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 82940 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20220408/889b37ad/attachment-0001.png>