[Pansophy] SNSPPU Cavity String Criteria - need input

Pashupati Dhakal dhakal at jlab.org
Wed Jan 26 20:18:59 EST 2022


Only 1-5 is realistic for cavity performance since 6-8 are the conditions at which the cavity test were performed. The steps 6-8 doesn’t tell anything on acceptance criteria.
For cryo modules , we don’t do high power test so the acceptance criteria should be steps 4,5 & 7.
If I missed anything Ed or Nahem can chime in.

Pashupati

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 26, 2022, at 6:56 PM, Valerie Bookwalter <bookwalt at jlab.org> wrote:


Jacob,

I was looking into modifying the Cavity String Drill Down report in the Project Portal to list the Acceptance Criteria as listed in the file you sent me.
HOWEVER, I have no idea which variable goes with which Criteria. If someone could please let the Pansophy Team know which variables to use for each of the 8 criteria listed below, then we can complete the Drill Down Report. Thanks for your help.
[cid:image001.jpg at 01D812E6.780AA050]

P.S. The same will be true for the Cryomodule Criteria (in this project and the next)

Valerie Bookwalter
Jefferson Lab, SRF Department
Pansophy Team
1-757-269-5802 (OFFICE – currently working offsite)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20220127/c9106ae5/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 43216 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20220127/c9106ae5/attachment-0002.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 43216 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20220127/c9106ae5/attachment-0003.jpg>


More information about the Pansophy mailing list