[Pansophy] L2HE Cavity String / cryomodule SN

[Katherine Wilson]

Although it seems a little weird, I think the easiest thing as we get into production will be to use the same numbers for everything, i.e., start at 22. But other thoughts are welcome if you disagree.

On Jan 27, 2022, at 12:48, Megan McDonald <megan at jlab.org> wrote:


We can do either! I think CSTSN and CMSN tend to be matching numbers so if you prefer to just use CMSN, it won’t cause an issue.

Megan

From: Pansophy <pansophy-bounces at mailman.jlab.org> On Behalf Of Tiffany Ganey
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2022 12:46 PM
To: pansophy at jlab.org; Katherine Wilson <kwilson at jlab.org>
Subject: [Pansophy] L2HE Cavity String / cryomodule SN

I’m not sure if this is a Katherine question or a Pansophy question (or someone else) –

For the L2HE cavity string assembly traveler, I need to know whether we will be using a CSTSN (cavity string SN) or a CMSN (cryomodule SN).  I believe for some projects, there is a CST SN for the Cleanroom CST assembly, and then a different number for the CM SN for the Cryomodule assembly.  I’m not sure what the plan is for L2HE.

Tiffany Ganey

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20220127/74af4695/attachment-0001.html>