[Pansophy] L2HE Cavity String / cryomodule SN

[Katherine Wilson]

Great, thank you, Tiffany!

________________________________
From: Tiffany Ganey <ganey at jlab.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2022 1:41 PM
To: Mike Dickey <mdickey at jlab.org>; Katherine Wilson <kwilson at jlab.org>; Megan McDonald <megan at jlab.org>
Cc: pansophy at jlab.org <pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: RE: L2HE Cavity String / cryomodule SN


When I meet with Danny tomorrow, I’ll discuss with him to (hopefully) verify that they are ok using CMSN to denote the cavity string being assembled.



Tiffany Ganey



From: Mike Dickey <mdickey at jlab.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2022 1:23 PM
To: Tiffany Ganey <ganey at jlab.org>; Katherine Wilson <kwilson at jlab.org>; Megan McDonald <megan at jlab.org>
Cc: pansophy at jlab.org
Subject: RE: L2HE Cavity String / cryomodule SN



All,



In the past CSTSN=22 would always progress to CMSN=22 where the serial number was always maintained, but the acronym would change based on what is was at the time.  The cleanroom folks build cavity strings and the folks on the floor build cryomodules.



I’m fine with CMSN at all workstations, but some folks may not agree.



Mike Dickey

SRF Inventory Technician

Jefferson Lab
12000 Jefferson Ave
Newport News, VA 23606
(757) 269-7755



From: Pansophy <pansophy-bounces at mailman.jlab.org<mailto:pansophy-bounces at mailman.jlab.org>> On Behalf Of Tiffany Ganey
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2022 1:01 PM
To: Katherine Wilson <kwilson at jlab.org<mailto:kwilson at jlab.org>>; Megan McDonald <megan at jlab.org<mailto:megan at jlab.org>>
Cc: pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: [Pansophy] L2HE Cavity String / cryomodule SN



I also would prefer to use the same SN for CST and CM.  I’ll go ahead and put <<CMSN>> in the CST assembly traveler.



Tiffany Ganey



From: Katherine Wilson <kwilson at jlab.org<mailto:kwilson at jlab.org>>
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2022 12:55 PM
To: Megan McDonald <megan at jlab.org<mailto:megan at jlab.org>>
Cc: Tiffany Ganey <ganey at jlab.org<mailto:ganey at jlab.org>>; pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: L2HE Cavity String / cryomodule SN



Although it seems a little weird, I think the easiest thing as we get into production will be to use the same numbers for everything, i.e., start at 22. But other thoughts are welcome if you disagree.



On Jan 27, 2022, at 12:48, Megan McDonald <megan at jlab.org<mailto:megan at jlab.org>> wrote:



We can do either! I think CSTSN and CMSN tend to be matching numbers so if you prefer to just use CMSN, it won’t cause an issue.



Megan



From: Pansophy <pansophy-bounces at mailman.jlab.org<mailto:pansophy-bounces at mailman.jlab.org>> On Behalf Of Tiffany Ganey
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2022 12:46 PM
To: pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>; Katherine Wilson <kwilson at jlab.org<mailto:kwilson at jlab.org>>
Subject: [Pansophy] L2HE Cavity String / cryomodule SN



I’m not sure if this is a Katherine question or a Pansophy question (or someone else) –



For the L2HE cavity string assembly traveler, I need to know whether we will be using a CSTSN (cavity string SN) or a CMSN (cryomodule SN).  I believe for some projects, there is a CST SN for the Cleanroom CST assembly, and then a different number for the CM SN for the Cryomodule assembly.  I’m not sure what the plan is for L2HE.



Tiffany Ganey


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20220128/9f0ea989/attachment.html>