[Pansophy] Proj SNSPPU: CM3 NCR review

[Ed Daly]

HI Ashley,
There may be a case where we would need your support to process an NCR.  It would not happen without some email or verbal discussion.
Hopefully you can be a back up to a back up.
Thanks,
Ed
________________________________
From: Naeem Huque <huque at jlab.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2022 3:01 PM
To: Ashley Anderson Mitchell <ashleya at jlab.org>; pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org>
Cc: Michael Drury <drury at jlab.org>; Ed Daly <edaly at jlab.org>; Jacob Harris <jharris at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: Proj SNSPPU: CM3 NCR review

All,

The NCRs on this traveler are non-standard and will require communication with ORNL. This communication is generally done by Ed or myself, but it wouldn't hurt to have another person on the list as a back-up.

Thanks,
Naeem
________________________________
From: Ashley Anderson Mitchell <ashleya at jlab.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2022 2:17 PM
To: Naeem Huque <huque at jlab.org>; pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org>
Cc: Michael Drury <drury at jlab.org>; Ed Daly <edaly at jlab.org>; Jacob Harris <jharris at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: Proj SNSPPU: CM3 NCR review

All,
I do not think I am qualified to be a dispositioner on this NCR, I should be added as informative.
________________________________
From: Naeem Huque <huque at jlab.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2022 1:26 PM
To: pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org>
Cc: Michael Drury <drury at jlab.org>; Ashley Anderson Mitchell <ashleya at jlab.org>; Ed Daly <edaly at jlab.org>; Jacob Harris <jharris at jlab.org>
Subject: Fw: Proj SNSPPU: CM3 NCR review

Hello,

Could you please swap out Mike Drury as an NCR dispositioner on SNSPPU-CMTF-CM-ACTS with Ashley. Direction from Mike is below.

Thanks,
Naeem



From: Mike Drury <drury at jlab.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2022 7:18 AM
To: Jacob Harris <jharris at jlab.org>; Mike McCaughan <michaelm at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: Proj SNSPPU: CM3 NCR review



Reopen the NCR's and let Naeem or Ed deal with them.  From now on, the testing team will not be closing out NCR's that they have generated.
Mike


On 7/25/2022 5:27 PM, Jacob Harris wrote:

Mike and Mike,

NCRs with a USE AS IS disposition require a technical justification – especially when they are written against a missed acceptance criteria. The NCRs 540, 545, and 546 will need to be reopened by the Pansophy Team so you can add final comments on the last page. You will need to request them to be reopened as they need to log the requestor and reason for the request.



The comments on the last page of the NCR must include a justification of why ORNL should accept an item that doesn’t meet their criteria (e.g. the measured warm beamline vacuum level is sufficient because ???”. The comment must also include an indication that ORNL is informed of the condition (e.g. email or a description of a verbal agreement such as “Verbal acceptance by ORNL in Friday meeting on Jul ??”. Also, the NCR regarding the limit switches may be a repair/Conforming disposition as ORNL has resolved the issue completely.



If you wish to discuss, I can reschedule a meeting for tomorrow or later this week. It should only be 15-30 minutes and we can fix the NCRs during the meeting.



_______________________________________________________________________________

Jacob Harris

SRF Operations Quality Engineer

Jefferson Lab

Newport News, VA 23606

Office: +1 (757) 269-7193

Cell: +1 (334) 345-3248

Email:   jharris at jlab.org<mailto:jharris at jlab.org>




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20220726/67806191/attachment.html>