[Pansophy] C100R-CAV-VTRF traveler

[Tiffany Ganey]

Good morning!

I noticed the other day that there was a "bug" with the C100R-CAV-VTRF traveler and I was wondering if this could be fixed without a revision?  On page 3, step 12, the data field label should be "Additional Run (No?)" both to match the step instructions and so that the logic becomes that the Init values (from step 11) are copied into the Final values (in step 13) if an additional run(s) is NOT required.  I'm not sure which way the checkbox logic is currently working.  Basically if the operator has to do an additional power rise, they need to enter the data from that last power rise into step 13 data fields since those values will be different than the initial power rise; however, if the cavity does not require any RF processing and only the initial power rise was needed to qualify the cavity, they can just click the checkbox in step 12 and the initial data in step 11 should copy to step 13.  The primary purpose of this is to make the data entry more consistent so that the data mining/ reporting is easier since we typically only report out on the final value.


[cid:image001.jpg at 01D8860B.D12191B0]

Tiffany Ganey

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20220622/6c88dd37/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 209826 bytes
Desc: image001.jpg
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20220622/6c88dd37/attachment-0001.jpg>