[Pansophy] C100R charge code

[Mike Drury]

Any work associated with the girders should go to RSRSRF.  The RSROW 
code was only in use during the last SAD and I think was only supposed 
to be used for procurements.
Mike


On 3/7/2022 8:56 AM, Allen Samuels wrote:
>
> Thanks Mike. Slight correction, I meant to ask about WMGRDR. I’m not 
> sure how C100R came in to play. That’s the one where RSROW stopped 
> working. Sorry about that.
>
> Allen
>
> *From:* Mike Drury <drury at jlab.org>
> *Sent:* Monday, March 7, 2022 8:47 AM
> *To:* Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org>
> *Cc:* pansophy at jlab.org
> *Subject:* Re: C100R charge code
>
> Sorry, that should be C1009C or C1009T.  C1009A is for assembly.
>
> On 3/7/2022 8:45 AM, Mike Drury wrote:
>
>     That is not a valid code for C100R.  If the work is associated
>     with acceptance testing, installation or commissioning of C1009R,
>     you should be using C1009A or C1009T.
>     Mike
>
>     On 3/7/2022 8:41 AM, Allen Samuels wrote:
>
>         I’ve been using RSROW. It was the one that I was given when we
>         started the project.
>
>         Allen
>
>         *From:* Mike Drury <drury at jlab.org> <mailto:drury at jlab.org>
>         *Sent:* Monday, March 7, 2022 8:40 AM
>         *To:* Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org> <mailto:samuels at jlab.org>
>         *Cc:* pansophy at jlab.org
>         *Subject:* Re: C100R charge code
>
>         Hi Allen,
>         Which C100R code are you referring to?
>         Mike
>
>         On 3/7/2022 8:39 AM, Allen Samuels wrote:
>
>             Mike,
>
>             The C100R charge code is no longer working. I keep getting
>             errors about how the project ended on the 24^th of
>             February. What should we be using going forward then?
>
>             Allen
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20220307/9631fbfd/attachment-0001.html>