[Pansophy] C100R-CMTF-CM-ACTS-R2

[Mike Drury]

Step 39 is indeed necessary.
Does fixing the numbering require another approval cycle?
Mike


On 1/25/2023 11:32 AM, Allen Samuels wrote:
>
> Mike,
>
> C100R-CMTF-CM-ACTS-R2 has been approved, but Mike McCaughan brought 
> something up in an approval comment that I wanted to ask about. He said
>
> “Numbering of steps missed a block on page 4 between steps 11/12; 
> revise present step 13 for corrected numbering.
>
> Is step 39 on page 14 necessary? In order to conduct the test it is 
> implicit that facility has a present/valid PSS static and functional 
> certification which wrings all of this out of the system.”
>
> Are these changes that need to be made? Does this traveler need to be 
> put on pause to discuss?
>
> Allen
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20230125/48edeed2/attachment.html>