[Pansophy] FW: FW: C75-RI-010 process traveler Question

[E. Anne McEwen]

Hi Uttar

Could you confirm that C75-10 and RI-NBSN2 are the same cavity (for certain)

Thanks Anne

From: Mike Dickey <mdickey at jlab.org>
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2023 7:59 AM
To: E. Anne McEwen <mcewen at jlab.org>; SRF Pansophy (pansophy at jlab.org) <pansophy at jlab.org>
Cc: Earl Mosby <mosby at jlab.org>; Christiana Wilson <grenoble at jlab.org>; George DeKerlegand <georged at jlab.org>; Gianluigi Ciovati <gciovati at jlab.org>
Subject: RE: [Pansophy] FW: C75-RI-010 process traveler Question

Hi Anne,

Attached are the results of a global search for 5C75-RI-010.  PRIMeS records show that it was received on 22-May-19 and delivered to RM 1012 - RF Tuning on the same day.

I have also attached a combined search for -RI-010 & -RI-NBSN2.  These serial numbers show up in C75, ER5C, & NB3SN projects.

Mike Dickey
SRF Inventory Technician
Jefferson Lab
12000 Jefferson Ave
Newport News, VA 23606
(757) 269-7755

From: Pansophy <pansophy-bounces at mailman.jlab.org<mailto:pansophy-bounces at mailman.jlab.org>> On Behalf Of E. Anne McEwen via Pansophy
Sent: Thursday, March 9, 2023 4:59 PM
To: SRF Pansophy (pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>) <pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>>
Cc: Earl Mosby <mosby at jlab.org<mailto:mosby at jlab.org>>; Christiana Wilson <grenoble at jlab.org<mailto:grenoble at jlab.org>>; George DeKerlegand <georged at jlab.org<mailto:georged at jlab.org>>; Gianluigi Ciovati <gciovati at jlab.org<mailto:gciovati at jlab.org>>
Subject: [Pansophy] FW: C75-RI-010 process traveler Question

Hello Pansophy Team

We have recently noticed there appears to be no CMM data for C75-RI-10 (see screen shot from Christiana) , however then realized that this cavity had previously a different SN  (Nb3SN) , so likely the CMM data would be under its previous SN

Gigi suggested I check which cavity went into the NB3SN Pair - and by process of elimination should then be able to deduce the Previous SN for C75-RI-10 (the cavity that did not go into the pair)

I did this, and it turns out that in the Pair is  using  C75-RI-NBSN1,  By process of elimination this would indicate that C75-RI10 would must have been previously called  C75-RI-NBSN2

Our question is can Pansophy link the CMM data from the C75-RI-NB3SN2 to C75-RI-10 ? We would like to avoid having to redo the CMM only because the serial number was changed

(C75-RI10 is of interest because the performance was extremely good, as was reported in the 8:30 meeting today )

Thanks for your help

Anne




PS Screen shot for the Nb3SN Pair is below


[cid:image001.png at 01D95321.2B1C4740]

From: Christiana Wilson <grenoble at jlab.org<mailto:grenoble at jlab.org>>
Sent: Thursday, March 9, 2023 4:38 PM
To: E. Anne McEwen <mcewen at jlab.org<mailto:mcewen at jlab.org>>
Subject: C75-RI-010 process traveler


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20230310/62bc139c/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 88085 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20230310/62bc139c/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 5C75-RI-010.xlsx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet
Size: 16372 bytes
Desc: 5C75-RI-010.xlsx
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20230310/62bc139c/attachment-0002.xlsx>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: XXXX-RI-010 and XXXX-RI-NBSN2 Combined by Date.xlsx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.spreadsheetml.sheet
Size: 24891 bytes
Desc: XXXX-RI-010 and XXXX-RI-NBSN2 Combined by Date.xlsx
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20230310/62bc139c/attachment-0003.xlsx>