[Pansophy] L2HE-CMA-FPFT-LEAK

[Valerie Bookwalter]

Tom,

Megan passed along your concern about L2HE-CMA-FPFT-LEAK traveler. I understand that it is time consuming to put in 6 separate travelers for a single leak check run, however the modifications that would be needed to support mixed number of leaks checks in a single run will cause problems with other parts of the system.

  1.  The SN used for NCRs/D3s can not be verified when multiple SNs are on a single traveler. We have encountered this in multiple places and have no way to determine the correct SN.
  2.  The SN search and Drill Down reports will not function as needed when having to search multiple labels for a single SN type.
  3.  ISO standards are being investigated which may require us to be better about entering data in EVERY field or notating the data field has been intentionally left blank. So, having, let's say 6 data fields, but your test only runs 2, then the other 4 would need to be labeled. We are still trying to figure out this.
Sorry I don't have a "good" answer for you right now.
We will continue to look into other options for entering data in your circumstance.


Valerie Bookwalter
Jefferson Lab, ACCEL
SRF Operations
SROPS Software Systems Group
1-757-269-5802 (OFFICE - currently working offsite)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20230515/c9a9a05b/attachment-0001.html>