[Pansophy] L2HE Beamline Inspection Travelers

[Michelle Oast]

Hi Allen,
Thanks for letting me know, I meant Reviewer 2 where Aaron is included.  I approved the travelers as they are now since all the inspection information we need on there is correct.  Please let me know if anything changes.
Thanks,
Michelle

From: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org>
Sent: Monday, May 22, 2023 8:56 AM
To: Michelle Oast <weinmann at jlab.org>
Cc: Gary Cheng <cheng at jlab.org>; Adam Grabowski <adamg at jlab.org>; pansophy at jlab.org
Subject: RE: L2HE Beamline Inspection Travelers

Michelle,

Reviewer 1 is reserved for the author of the traveler. As you are the author, and it says so in the WCD, I believe we should leave the travelers as they are routed.

Allen

From: Michelle Oast <weinmann at jlab.org<mailto:weinmann at jlab.org>>
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2023 2:44 PM
To: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org<mailto:samuels at jlab.org>>
Cc: Gary Cheng <cheng at jlab.org<mailto:cheng at jlab.org>>; Adam Grabowski <adamg at jlab.org<mailto:adamg at jlab.org>>; pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: RE: L2HE Beamline Inspection Travelers

Hi Allen,
>From my conversation with Jacob I think if Gary was changed to reviewer #1 it might be more conforming with WCD.  If not, I'd be happy to approve as is.
Thanks,
Michelle

From: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org<mailto:samuels at jlab.org>>
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2023 11:32 AM
To: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org<mailto:samuels at jlab.org>>; Michelle Oast <weinmann at jlab.org<mailto:weinmann at jlab.org>>
Cc: Gary Cheng <cheng at jlab.org<mailto:cheng at jlab.org>>; Adam Grabowski <adamg at jlab.org<mailto:adamg at jlab.org>>; pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: RE: L2HE Beamline Inspection Travelers

I should note that the versions going out now are also not conforming to the WCD, but the document is being revised anyways. This is just something I wanted to bring up.

Allen

From: Pansophy <pansophy-bounces at mailman.jlab.org<mailto:pansophy-bounces at mailman.jlab.org>> On Behalf Of Allen Samuels via Pansophy
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2023 10:07 AM
To: Michelle Oast <weinmann at jlab.org<mailto:weinmann at jlab.org>>
Cc: Gary Cheng <cheng at jlab.org<mailto:cheng at jlab.org>>; E. Anne McEwen <mcewen at jlab.org<mailto:mcewen at jlab.org>>; Adam Grabowski <adamg at jlab.org<mailto:adamg at jlab.org>>; pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: [Pansophy] L2HE Beamline Inspection Travelers

Michelle,

The travelers have been revised based on requirements from Tony. They also don't follow the WCD, which is something they're pushing harder on us to comply with. Valerie has put out some revised version that I will be routing in a moment. Please let us know if you have any other questions.

Allen

From: Michelle Oast <weinmann at jlab.org<mailto:weinmann at jlab.org>>
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2023 8:49 AM
To: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org<mailto:samuels at jlab.org>>
Cc: E. Anne McEwen <mcewen at jlab.org<mailto:mcewen at jlab.org>>; pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>; Adam Grabowski <adamg at jlab.org<mailto:adamg at jlab.org>>; Gary Cheng <cheng at jlab.org<mailto:cheng at jlab.org>>
Subject: FW: L2HE Beamline Inspection Travelers

Hi Allen,
I'm not sure why the people included on the approvals/NCR/D3 notifications are not acceptable.  Anne is included as a WCLead for approvals and I thought Gary and Liang counted as SRFops subject matter experts on plating/bellows.  Please let me know if I'm mistaken.
Thanks,
Michelle

From: E. Anne McEwen <mcewen at jlab.org<mailto:mcewen at jlab.org>>
Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2023 4:00 PM
To: Michelle Oast <weinmann at jlab.org<mailto:weinmann at jlab.org>>; Adam Grabowski <adamg at jlab.org<mailto:adamg at jlab.org>>; Gary Cheng <cheng at jlab.org<mailto:cheng at jlab.org>>
Cc: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org<mailto:samuels at jlab.org>>; SRF Pansophy (pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>) <pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>>
Subject: FW: L2HE Beamline Inspection Travelers

Hi Michelle & all

FYI, just a reminder  Kara is still working to the previous version of the traveler since this is what is approved and released in Pansophy

Could you please take a look and decide on the next steps for this traveler  , in particular I understand there is a photo of the weld defect from Fermi that we should be looking for

Thanks Anne

From: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org<mailto:samuels at jlab.org>>
Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 1:09 PM
To: Adam Grabowski <adamg at jlab.org<mailto:adamg at jlab.org>>
Cc: Michelle Oast <weinmann at jlab.org<mailto:weinmann at jlab.org>>; Tony Reilly <areilly at jlab.org<mailto:areilly at jlab.org>>; pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>; E. Anne McEwen <mcewen at jlab.org<mailto:mcewen at jlab.org>>
Subject: L2HE Beamline Inspection Travelers

Adam,

I understand you spoke with Valerie today on approval names and NCR/D3 usernames. I have some concerns regarding the ones in these L2HE beamline inspection travelers, especially how there doesn't appear to be any SRFOPS SMEs or WCLeads listed as approvers or as a NCR Dispositioner/D3 Email. Please discuss these Michelle and make any changes necessary to make sure the right people are being kept in the loop. If we can get this sorted and assuming the confusion about the WCD update process is fixed, we should be good to route for approval.

Allen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20230522/5a203ac4/attachment-0001.html>