[Pansophy] BLBU Bellows

[E. Anne McEwen]

Hi Kara

In my opinion a D3 would be good to capture the lessons learned. This is a situation where we have multiple suppliers on the same part and in the same traveler - but lack the mechanism in Pansophy to keep track of this - Also, when there is more than one supplier they need to be told in advance what SN to use - then they would come in pre engraved with the correct SN . In the longer term Pasnophy and Inventory are working a solution for this - its just not there yet

Just my two cents

Anne

From: Kara Chandler <karac at jlab.org>
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2023 10:05 AM
To: Michelle Oast <weinmann at jlab.org>; Adam Grabowski <adamg at jlab.org>
Cc: E. Anne McEwen <mcewen at jlab.org>; Gary Cheng <cheng at jlab.org>; Liang Zhao <lzhao at jlab.org>
Subject: BLBU Bellows

Hi All,

The original serials are crossed out on Bellows BLBU SN023 & SN024.  Wouldn't this warrant a D3?

I am aware there was a Rev change, but I don't know at what point in the purchasing process it occurred.  Nonetheless, an altered serial is never acceptable in my experience with ISO 9001:2015, and it would be a classified as a major finding in an audit.  Any serial changes should be done by the vendor with the original serial followed by RWRK-Rev.  Otherwise, traceability does not exist.

Any thoughts?

Kara
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20230928/2995af0b/attachment.html>