[Pansophy] NB3SN-CMTF-CM-ACTS Duplicating Fieldnames

[Mike Drury]

Thanks for the assist.
mike


On 4/17/2024 4:21 PM, Allen Samuels wrote:
>
> So they are both needed. At this stage it’s just going to be faster 
> for me to do it myself, but I appreciate the offer to make the edit 
> for me.
>
> Allen
>
> *From:* Mike Drury <drury at jlab.org>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 17, 2024 4:20 PM
> *To:* Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org>
> *Cc:* pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org>
> *Subject:* Re: NB3SN-CMTF-CM-ACTS Duplicating Fieldnames
>
> Hi Allen,
> I would add a "1" to any signals in the 1st group that repeat and a 
> "2" in the 2nd group.
> ex: C74KQextTech1 in the first group / C74KQextTech2 in the second group.
> Do you want me to edit and upload new version?
> Sorry for the confusion.
> Mike
>
> On 4/17/2024 3:50 PM, Allen Samuels wrote:
>
>     Mike,
>
>     I was processing the NB3SN-CMTF-CM-ACTS traveler when I ran into
>     some issues. I got an error about a repeating fieldname, and upon
>     further investigation it looks like entire sections are repeating.
>     The first one goes from step 41 to 52, the second from 58 to 65.
>     If this is a duplication of areas, which one do you want removed?
>     If they are both supposed to be there, we will need to rename the
>     fields in one of the areas. If it’s the latter, I would appreciate
>     your assistance in renaming, as I am having trouble finding
>     noticeable differences to use for a name change.
>
>     Thank you for your time,
>
>     Allen Samuels
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20240417/7d5fbc7e/attachment-0001.html>