[Pansophy] Traveler request for C75 pair and C100 cavity plasma processing

[Harshani Senevirathne]

  *
The Traveler ID was a bit off. Using the Pansophy Acronym list<https://pansophy.jlab.org/pansophy/Travelers/UserTools/dAcronyms.cfm>, I came up with PLACLN-VTA-CAV-PROC-R1. If this isn't correct, let me know. - This ID is fine, but need two traveler IDs for the C100 cavity and C75 pair plasma processing.
  *
Fixed a few NCR/D3 usernames-It is fine
  *
Changed the fieldnames in step 1 to be more descriptive - It is fine
  *
I wasn't sure exactly what you were doing with the first field in step 3. You have 2 fieldnames connected to the <<FLOAT>> field. Did this field accidentally get two fieldnames, or did you want two different fields? No need only one field name as [[Init_VTATest_TravelerName]] <<FLOAT>>
  *
In the Plasma Processing Round 1 area, you have a <<TEXT>> field. These are alright, but not very common anymore. If this phase shifter ID will be just numerals, we could switch it to an <<INTEGER>> field if you'd like. Otherwise, we can leave it as is.
[[R1C1_PSID]] <<TEXT>> This includes numbers and letters both

-Harshani
________________________________
From: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 5:17 PM
To: pansophy at jlab.org <pansophy at jlab.org>; Harshani Senevirathne <iresha at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: [Pansophy] Traveler request for C75 pair and C100 cavity plasma processing

I wanted to get at least one back to you before I closed for the night. I reviewed the first one, which was mostly good, but I had a few changes to make

  *
The Traveler ID was a bit off. Using the Pansophy Acronym list<https://pansophy.jlab.org/pansophy/Travelers/UserTools/dAcronyms.cfm>, I came up with PLACLN-VTA-CAV-PROC-R1. If this isn't correct, let me know.
  *
Fixed a few NCR/D3 usernames
  *
Changed the fieldnames in step 1 to be more descriptive
  *
I wasn't sure exactly what you were doing with the first field in step 3. You have 2 fieldnames connected to the <<FLOAT>> field. Did this field accidentally get two fieldnames, or did you want two different fields?
  *
In the Plasma Processing Round 1 area, you have a <<TEXT>> field. These are alright, but not very common anymore. If this phase shifter ID will be just numerals, we could switch it to an <<INTEGER>> field if you'd like. Otherwise, we can leave it as is.

Other than those few things, this was a good traveler. I've attached it for your consideration. You can send it back to me after you review, or if you think it is ready to go out then please put it in the PLACLN ready for approvals folder<https://jlabdoc.jlab.org/docushare/dsweb/View/Collection-51338>. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to reach out.

Allen

________________________________
From: Pansophy <pansophy-bounces at mailman.jlab.org> on behalf of Harshani Senevirathne via Pansophy <pansophy at mailman.jlab.org>
Sent: Monday, December 2, 2024 10:31 AM
To: pansophy at jlab.org <pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: [Pansophy] Traveler request for C75 pair and C100 cavity plasma processing

Good morning,

I need to create two travelers for the C75 pair and C100 cavity plasma processing.
Please find the draft documents

https://jlabdoc.jlab.org/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-292162/PLACLN-C100CAV-PLSM_R1.docx

https://jlabdoc.jlab.org/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-292161/PLACLN-C75CAV-PLSM_R1.docx

Thank you,
Harshani
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20241205/0f637bd6/attachment-0001.html>