[Pansophy] Pansophy Request Confirmation:

[Kirk Davis]

I agree with Megan that the Pansophy chart column heading should match the Excel columns. I agree with Christiana that the column heading in both cases could be renamed to make it easier to understand what the number represents.  I doubt that anyone is using this number from the Pansophy report, so I would be OK with just removing it from the Pansophy table.  Then we get into the meaning of the adjacent Q0 column, which would be better labeled "Low Field Q0." I'm not sure I have a good solution, other than user familiarity with the Excel spreadsheet or a comprehensive renaming of the Excel column headings.
  An alternative solution would be to group the columns Eacc, Q0, QextIn, QextFp under a label "Decay Measurements."

Thoughts on these observations?  I think that last one might be the easiest overall if Pansophy can accommodate the change

Kirk Davis
Cavity Processing Group Leader

Jefferson Lab
600 KELVIN DR STE 8
Newport News, VA 23606-4468

757-560-4232 mobile
________________________________
From: Megan McDonald <megan at jlab.org>
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2024 4:03 PM
To: Christiana Wilson <grenoble at jlab.org>; Kirk Davis <kdavis at jlab.org>
Cc: pansophy at jlab.org <pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: RE: [Pansophy] Pansophy Request Confirmation:


Christiana,

The report pulls from the traveler and uses the exact fieldnames that are in the traveler and we can’t adjust the labels on this one. So the labels/column headers that you see match the field in the traveler. As far as removing it, I am unsure of who else uses this report so I am hesitant to remove a data field that has been in it the whole time its been available so I have added Kirk to this.



Kirk, any thoughts?



Megan McDonald



From: Christiana Wilson <grenoble at jlab.org>
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2024 2:25 PM
To: Megan McDonald <megan at jlab.org>
Cc: pansophy at jlab.org
Subject: Re: [Pansophy] Pansophy Request Confirmation:



The Emax label is confusing. It either should be removed or renamed Eacc Qe2 calibration.

Christiana Wilson



On Feb 19, 2024, at 13:52, Megan McDonald <megan at jlab.org<mailto:megan at jlab.org>> wrote:



Christiana,

EmaxMVm is already on that report. It is 3 columns to the right of Eacc, right after Qfp. Is there anything else that needs to be done or can I close this service request?

<image001.png>

Megan



From: Pansophy <pansophy-bounces at mailman.jlab.org<mailto:pansophy-bounces at mailman.jlab.org>> On Behalf Of adapps--- via Pansophy
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2024 3:55 PM
To: Valerie Bookwalter <bookwalt at jlab.org<mailto:bookwalt at jlab.org>>; Christiana Wilson <grenoble at jlab.org<mailto:grenoble at jlab.org>>
Cc: pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: [Pansophy] Pansophy Request Confirmation:



Hello GRENOBLE
Your request has been successfully received.
Soon a pansophy team member will be assigned to your request.
They may reach out to you for more information if needed.
You will recieve another email after your request has been completed.


Request Type: General Request
Priority Level: 1
Request Notes: In the Datamine->Cavity Performance->ER5C selection. The Eacc should be changed to EmaxMVm. The Eacc is the value measured during the Qfp calibration and is not the information the end user is looking for in the report.
Project: ER5C






Have a great day.
Pansophy Team
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20240220/5583414c/attachment.html>