[Pansophy] Disapproved ER5C Travelers

[Allen Samuels]

Gigi,


According to emails, ER5C-CHEM-CAV-HPR-R2 was disapproved because "Steps 2 and 3 has references to C50-CAV-HPR.", and "There should be a checkbox to determine whether hot or cold UPW was used for HPR". ER5C-TUNE-CAV-R6 was disapproved because "Can we add the FPC Qext  max and min value like the FP Qext". I sent both of these documents back to the authors and approvers, but never got any response to them.



Allen


From: Gianluigi Ciovati <gciovati at jlab.org>
Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 2024 10:55 AM
To: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org>; Matt Weaks <weaksmc at jlab.org>
Cc: Alex Wildeson <wildeson at jlab.org>; Tony Reilly <areilly at jlab.org>; Roland Overton <overtonr at jlab.org>; Danny Forehand <forehand at jlab.org>; Kirk Davis <kdavis at jlab.org>; pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: Disapproved ER5C Travelers

Hi Allen,
what were the reasons for disapproval?

Thanks,
Gigi
________________________________
From: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org<mailto:samuels at jlab.org>>
Sent: Wednesday, May 1, 2024 10:49 AM
To: Matt Weaks <weaksmc at jlab.org<mailto:weaksmc at jlab.org>>
Cc: Alex Wildeson <wildeson at jlab.org<mailto:wildeson at jlab.org>>; Gianluigi Ciovati <gciovati at jlab.org<mailto:gciovati at jlab.org>>; Tony Reilly <areilly at jlab.org<mailto:areilly at jlab.org>>; Roland Overton <overtonr at jlab.org<mailto:overtonr at jlab.org>>; Danny Forehand <forehand at jlab.org<mailto:forehand at jlab.org>>; Kirk Davis <kdavis at jlab.org<mailto:kdavis at jlab.org>>; pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org<mailto:pansophy at jlab.org>>
Subject: Disapproved ER5C Travelers


Matt,



I was combing through my list of documents out for approval, and noticed there's to ER5C travelers that went out several months ago only to be disapproved shortly after. I haven't heard anything about them since, and wanted to reach out and ask for an update. The travelers are ER5C-CHEM-CAV-HPR-R2, and ER5C-TUNE-CAV-R6. Is there any update on the revisions to make the travelers good to go back out? Alternatively, if the travelers aren't needed anymore, could they be removed from the approvals folder and my list?



Allen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20240501/bcb28434/attachment.html>