[Pansophy] Fw: Safety Procedure

[Allen Samuels]

Justin,

Could you please comment on this procedure? It looks like it's using the same template as other procedures, but the ID is off, it's a scanned paper approval, and I have no record of it going through our system.

Allen
________________________________
From: Philip Denny <denny at jlab.org>
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2025 10:53 AM
To: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org>
Cc: pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: Safety Procedure

Thanks for info Allen,

But in this case the author (Justin) is completely responsible for the VTA safety and documentation. I assume it was a rush given the DOE/Lab management involvement with the VTA the last few months and maybe you were out at the time. I am not really sure.

Phil

________________________________
From: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org>
Sent: Monday, March 31, 2025 10:46 AM
To: Philip Denny <denny at jlab.org>
Cc: pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: Safety Procedure

Phil,

I was reviewing an EIC591SC traveler when I noticed that it had an unusual procedure linked to it. SRF-VTA-RF-POST<https://jlabdoc.jlab.org/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-293060/SRF-VTA-VTRF-POST-R1.pdf> is a safety procedure that was not sent through approvals by me, was printed out and signed instead of routed through DocuShare, and then scanned and uploaded to DocuShare. Normally, procedure and other QMS document approvals are under pansophy control. But since this is a safety procedure and thus under your infrastructure area, I wanted to ask you and see if this was alright before bringing it up with the author. Could you comment?

Allen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20250404/c3e973fc/attachment.html>