[Pansophy] EIC Fab Travelers

[Naeem Huque]

Hi Allen,

In response to bullet two, these are meant to be EIC197 as it has replaced EICCRB

Thanks,
Naeem
________________________________
From: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2025 5:06 PM
To: Shyamala Shanmugasundaram <shanmug at jlab.org>; Naeem Huque <huque at jlab.org>
Cc: John Buttles <buttles at jlab.org>; pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: EIC Fab Travelers

Shyamala,

I've reviewed your EIC Fabrication travelers and need to send them back for revision. There's a few things that I changed, and a few things that need clarification.


  *
I've renamed the travelers to EICCRB-FAB-HHOM-EBW and EICCRB-FAB-VHOM-EBW to comply with our naming conventions
  *
Are these EICCRB or EIC197 travelers? The project name in the ID is EICCRB, but they were put in the EIC197 area and mention the project in the traveler.
  *
I changed the reference links to go directly to the reference, not the info page.
  *
We can't have links going to sharepoint. The Fabrication Plan reference will have to be moved to another location. If you could tell me more about it, I should be able to tell you where it goes.
  *
In VHOM, there's a blank line for step 4 in the table of contents. Was this intentional?
  *
The first data page in the body of the traveler needs a serial number field, user drop down, timestamp, and a comment. I fixed this by combining the pages for step 0 and 1.
  *
The <<SN>> field is not allowed to be used in this project. Please submit pansophy service requests for the SNs to get them added.
     *
the HWGOUTSN and VWGOUTSN SNs can be shortened to HWGOUSN and VWGOUSN respectively

I've attached both travelers to the email for easy reference. Please use these versions to make any further updates.


Allen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20250211/2015ec49/attachment.html>