[Pansophy] Traveler request for C75 pair and C100 cavity plasma processing

[Roger Ruber]

Thank you Allen,

Approved the document.

Best regards,
Roger.

-----Original Message-----
From: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org> 
Sent: Friday, 10 January, 2025 12:23
To: Roger Ruber <ruber at jlab.org>; Harshani Senevirathne <iresha at jlab.org>; pansophy at jlab.org
Cc: Tom Powers <powers at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: [Pansophy] Traveler request for C75 pair and C100 cavity plasma processing

Roger,

Ready for approvals is where people put documents that are ready. I review and put them in the project's approval folder <https://jlabdoc.jlab.org/docushare/dsweb/View/Collection-51724> . You can also see all the files routed to you for approval by clicking on my tasks at the top of the page.

Allen

________________________________

From: Roger Ruber <ruber at jlab.org>
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2025 12:18 PM
To: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org>; Harshani Senevirathne <iresha at jlab.org>; pansophy at jlab.org <pansophy at jlab.org>
Cc: Tom Powers <powers at jlab.org>; Roger Ruber <ruber at jlab.org>
Subject: RE: [Pansophy] Traveler request for C75 pair and C100 cavity plasma processing 
 
Dear Allen,

Apologies for missing this.

The DocuShare folder for ER5C ready for approvals seems empty when I look at it:
https://jlabdoc.jlab.org/docushare/dsweb/View/Collection-51713

Best regards,
Roger.

-----Original Message-----
From: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org> 
Sent: Friday, 10 January, 2025 10:47
To: Harshani Senevirathne <iresha at jlab.org>; pansophy at jlab.org
Cc: Tom Powers <powers at jlab.org>; Roger Ruber <ruber at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: [Pansophy] Traveler request for C75 pair and C100 cavity plasma processing

Iresha,

Both these travelers are still out for approval. C100R is waiting on Tom, and ER5C is waiting on both Tom and Roger.

Allen

________________________________

From: Harshani Senevirathne <iresha at jlab.org>
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2025 10:34 AM
To: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org>; pansophy at jlab.org <pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: [Pansophy] Traveler request for C75 pair and C100 cavity plasma processing 
 
C100R-VTA-CAV-PLSM-R1 
ER5C-VTA-CAV-PLSM_R1

Are these travelers available now? 
-Harshani
________________________________

From: Harshani Senevirathne <iresha at jlab.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2024 1:29 PM
To: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org>; pansophy at jlab.org <pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: [Pansophy] Traveler request for C75 pair and C100 cavity plasma processing 
 
Done, Thank you. 
-Harshani
________________________________

From: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2024 1:23 PM
To: Harshani Senevirathne <iresha at jlab.org>; pansophy at jlab.org <pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: [Pansophy] Traveler request for C75 pair and C100 cavity plasma processing 
 
Looks good to me, apart from the document name. Rename and drop them in their respective project's ready for approvals folder. I can route from there.

Allen
https://jlabdoc.jlab.org/docushare/dsweb/View/Collection-51713
https://jlabdoc.jlab.org/docushare/dsweb/View/Collection-49545

________________________________

From: Harshani Senevirathne <iresha at jlab.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2024 1:16 PM
To: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org>; pansophy at jlab.org <pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: [Pansophy] Traveler request for C75 pair and C100 cavity plasma processing 
 
I made changes to the first page of both documents.
-Harshani
________________________________

From: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2024 12:41 PM
To: Harshani Senevirathne <iresha at jlab.org>; pansophy at jlab.org <pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: [Pansophy] Traveler request for C75 pair and C100 cavity plasma processing 
 
So these are not PLACLN travelers, and instead should go in their respective projects? In that case, let's go with those IDs. I've attached the final versions I have for both of the travelers for your consideration. If all that's changed is the ID and the info on the first page, I'd appreciate it if you copied your P0s over to my documents, rename them, and put them in ready for approval. That way we can preserve any other minor edits I've made here and there (like page breaks and extra spaces). Your P0s look good, just change Matt Weaks' username to weaksmc please.

Allen

________________________________

From: Harshani Senevirathne <iresha at jlab.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2024 12:31 PM
To: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org>; pansophy at jlab.org <pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: [Pansophy] Traveler request for C75 pair and C100 cavity plasma processing 
 
We can use traveler names as 
C100 --> C100R-VTA-CAV-PLSM
C75 --> ER5C-VTA-CAV-PLSM

I made a few changes to the followings.

For C100 traveler 
NCR Informative Emails 
areilly,fhumphry,michaelm,iresha,weinmann 
NCR Dispositioners 
powers,drury,gciovati 
D3 Emails 
areilly,fhumphry,michaelm,powers,drury,gciovati 
Approval Names 
H. Senevirathne 
G. Ciovati 
T. Powers 
 

C75 pair traveler
NCR Informative Emails 
areilly,fhumphry,michaelm,iresha,grenoble,mweaks,ruber 
NCR Dispositioners 
powers,drury,gciovati,ruber 
D3 Emails 
areilly,fhumphry,michaelm,powers,drury,gciovati,Grenoble,mweaks 
Approval Names 
H. Senevirathne 
G. Ciovati 
T. Powers 
R. Ruber 
-Harshani


________________________________

From: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2024 11:03 AM
To: Harshani Senevirathne <iresha at jlab.org>; pansophy at jlab.org <pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: [Pansophy] Traveler request for C75 pair and C100 cavity plasma processing 
 
Harshani

The second traveler looks fine as well, save for the changes that were also in the first one. It too needs a different ID, which poses a problem since we can't have two travelers with the same ID. I need to double check with Valerie, but what I'm thinking we do is add -C75 or -C100 at the end of the respective travelers to differentiate. We did it before in the ER5C merge when there were identical C75 or C50 travelers. If this alright with her, does that sound like an acceptable idea to you?

Also just to be clear, this work is occurring in the VTA right? Or is there a better WCA to use?

Allen

________________________________

From: Harshani Senevirathne <iresha at jlab.org>
Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2024 9:51 AM
To: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org>; pansophy at jlab.org <pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: [Pansophy] Traveler request for C75 pair and C100 cavity plasma processing 
 

*       
        The Traveler ID was a bit off. Using the Pansophy Acronym list <https://pansophy.jlab.org/pansophy/Travelers/UserTools/dAcronyms.cfm> , I came up with PLACLN-VTA-CAV-PROC-R1. If this isn't correct, let me know. - This ID is fine, but need two traveler IDs for the C100 cavity and C75 pair plasma processing.
*       
        Fixed a few NCR/D3 usernames-It is fine
*       
        Changed the fieldnames in step 1 to be more descriptive - It is fine
*       
        I wasn't sure exactly what you were doing with the first field in step 3. You have 2 fieldnames connected to the <<FLOAT>> field. Did this field accidentally get two fieldnames, or did you want two different fields? No need only one field name as [[Init_VTATest_TravelerName]] <<FLOAT>>
*       
        In the Plasma Processing Round 1 area, you have a <<TEXT>> field. These are alright, but not very common anymore. If this phase shifter ID will be just numerals, we could switch it to an <<INTEGER>> field if you'd like. Otherwise, we can leave it as is.
        [[R1C1_PSID]] <<TEXT>> This includes numbers and letters both

-Harshani
________________________________

From: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org>
Sent: Wednesday, December 4, 2024 5:17 PM
To: pansophy at jlab.org <pansophy at jlab.org>; Harshani Senevirathne <iresha at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: [Pansophy] Traveler request for C75 pair and C100 cavity plasma processing 
 
I wanted to get at least one back to you before I closed for the night. I reviewed the first one, which was mostly good, but I had a few changes to make

*       
        The Traveler ID was a bit off. Using the Pansophy Acronym list <https://pansophy.jlab.org/pansophy/Travelers/UserTools/dAcronyms.cfm> , I came up with PLACLN-VTA-CAV-PROC-R1. If this isn't correct, let me know.
*       
        Fixed a few NCR/D3 usernames
*       
        Changed the fieldnames in step 1 to be more descriptive
*       
        I wasn't sure exactly what you were doing with the first field in step 3. You have 2 fieldnames connected to the <<FLOAT>> field. Did this field accidentally get two fieldnames, or did you want two different fields?
*       
        In the Plasma Processing Round 1 area, you have a <<TEXT>> field. These are alright, but not very common anymore. If this phase shifter ID will be just numerals, we could switch it to an <<INTEGER>> field if you'd like. Otherwise, we can leave it as is.

Other than those few things, this was a good traveler. I've attached it for your consideration. You can send it back to me after you review, or if you think it is ready to go out then please put it in the PLACLN ready for approvals folder <https://jlabdoc.jlab.org/docushare/dsweb/View/Collection-51338> . If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to reach out.

Allen

________________________________

From: Pansophy <pansophy-bounces at mailman.jlab.org> on behalf of Harshani Senevirathne via Pansophy <pansophy at mailman.jlab.org>
Sent: Monday, December 2, 2024 10:31 AM
To: pansophy at jlab.org <pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: [Pansophy] Traveler request for C75 pair and C100 cavity plasma processing 
 
Good morning,

I need to create two travelers for the C75 pair and C100 cavity plasma processing.
Please find the draft documents 

https://jlabdoc.jlab.org/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-292162/PLACLN-C100CAV-PLSM_R1.docx

https://jlabdoc.jlab.org/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-292161/PLACLN-C75CAV-PLSM_R1.docx

Thank you,
Harshani