[Pansophy] L2HE travelers

[Allen Samuels]

Michelle,

I see now for the degreasing travelers that the only change is with changing Mike Bevins out for Adam, which is fine. That said, the WCD is woefully out of date for L2HE. This might be more of an Adam thing, but we need to get it updated. I can put the travelers out alongside the WCD, but the approval process will have to wait until we have something to validate against.

Allen
________________________________
From: Michelle Oast <weinmann at jlab.org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2025 8:23 AM
To: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org>; Adam Grabowski <adamg at jlab.org>
Cc: pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: Re: L2HE travelers

Hi Allen,
These travelers are brand new, I've had to split up the previous version (L2HE-CHEM-BLA-DEGR) because production wasn't matching up with the documentation.  I haven't changed the approvers, NCR, or D3 usernames since the prior version.
For L2HE-CHEM-BLACRM-DEGR-R1, please leave the fields as they are.  There's not much to it, we just need the ceramic SN and proof it was cleaned.
For the furnace traveler, thank you for the name correction.
Thanks,
Michelle
________________________________
From: Allen Samuels <samuels at jlab.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2025 5:16 PM
To: Michelle Oast <weinmann at jlab.org>; Adam Grabowski <adamg at jlab.org>
Cc: pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: L2HE travelers

Michelle and Adam,

I've been reviewing the L2HE travelers in the ready for approvals folders and had some concerns. Chiefly to start with, I'm not able to find them in the L2HE WCD, meaning I can't validate the approval names and NCR/D3 usernames against it. Until I am able to get that, I'll need to put a hold on the travelers.

I also have a question and recommended change for two of the travelers.

  *
For L2HE-CHEM-BLACRM-DEGR-R1, I understand it's basically pulling step 4 from the previous version of L2HE-CHEM-BLA-DEGR. I also noticed that the fields didn't fully line up with what was in step 4. Were some of them no longer needed, or was this an error? Not the end of the world either way, I'm just trying to make sure that all necessary data is accounted for.
  *
For L2HE-FURN-BLA-R1, unless you have any objections I'd like to rename it to L2HE-FURN-BLA-BAKE-R1 since the action appears to line up with the BAKE acronym.

Thank you for your time,

Allen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20250723/27df1cb5/attachment-0001.htm>