[Pansophy] C100R-VTA-CAV-PLSM

[Allen Samuels]

Harshani,

I'm replying again so soon because I realized I forgot to mention that these fields are on page 1 of the C100R-VTA-CAV-PLSM traveler, and the paragraph cut off at me asking if the [[Init_VTATest_TravelerName]] field needed to be something like a <<TEXT>> or <<COMMENT>> field.

Allen
________________________________
From: Pansophy <pansophy-bounces at mailman.jlab.org> on behalf of Allen Samuels via Pansophy <pansophy at mailman.jlab.org>
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2025 4:41 PM
To: Harshani Senevirathne <iresha at jlab.org>
Cc: pansophy <pansophy at jlab.org>
Subject: [Pansophy] C100R-VTA-CAV-PLSM

Harshani,

I wanted to give you an update on your travelers. They're approved and I'm working on getting them into pansophy, but there's been some snags and I'm not sure I can get them in today.

I did have two questions that I didn't notice until I started working on this. First, in step 3 you have Init_VTATest_TravelerName and Init_VTATest_TravelerNumber; both with <<INTEGER>> fields. Was the first one supposed to be an
Second, in step 4 you have a <<TEXT>> file for Phase Shifter ID. Is this being used ton input serial numbers?

Allen
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.jlab.org/pipermail/pansophy/attachments/20250324/e1895b2b/attachment-0001.html>